Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josina Anderson thoughts on the Burns situation


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 2/21/2024 at 7:51 PM, Ivan The Awesome said:

She's skewing a lot. Yes Burns is good. He's not 30M dollar good though.

 

Lions need to call and offer Williamson a 1st and a mid round pick for him.

I'd take Williamson, a 2nd and a 3rd. And never look back or question the move. Win for both teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

I bet one of those is not running by the QB and only grabbing them with 1 arm and missing the sack. I like Burns but he has so many miss sacks. 

Playing run defense, giving full effort......could be a number of things

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other NFL players can probably assess Burn's work on the field as much or better than you or I?

They probably are looking at the money and going, man, you aren't earning that money. And they also realize that one bad contract like that means less money available for more players on a team. 

Burns at $27 million could be $1 million more for 27 team members... just saying.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khyber53 said:

Other NFL players can probably assess Burn's work on the field as much or better than you or I?

They probably are looking at the money and going, man, you aren't earning that money. And they also realize that one bad contract like that means less money available for more players on a team. 

Burns at $27 million could be $1 million more for 27 team members... just saying.

 

Yeah there is a door that swings two ways here. The players know if a guy is worth the money or not and note who the sap organizations are. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2024 at 8:22 PM, Jon Snow said:

It's about time they stop rewarding mediocre players for mediocre effort.  Screw the moral in the building. Those guys have been one of the worst, and now the worst team the in the league. Its not all on the coaches as to why they suck. If they don't like it it gtfo. We've had too much of that attitude in the building for too long.

Agree with this 100%. Set the tone as an organization, let the chips fall where they may.

Morgans wants dogs..if the puppies start whining show them the door.

All this empower the players ish got us a bunch of whiney entitled softserve drama queens. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Turtle said:

Agree with this 100%. Set the tone as an organization, let the chips fall where they may.

Morgans wants dogs..if the puppies start whining show them the door.

All this empower the players ish got us a bunch of whiney entitled softserve drama queens. 

You know what though? Do you remember Canales’ gushing over those precious fragile things? Basically promising to pamper them.

You can’t really listen to them because they say diametrically opposed poo if it suits them in that moment.  

I mean, by what they say we are gonna get dawgs, if French Poodles are dawgs. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...