Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes Vs blue jackets 7pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

SAT line looks good.

Would have liked to land Petterson because I think he’d have been really good with Jarvis.

Definitely need a shakeup trade wise.

The second line needs a lot of help.

This win felt gross. I don’t know. KK is Pool party bad at this point. Need to make a splash to add scoring. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

This win felt gross. I don’t know. KK is Pool party bad at this point. Need to make a splash to add scoring. 

Only line I like right now is:

Svechnikov - Aho - Teravainen

I’d like to land a 2C and have:

Necas - 2C - Jarvis

Then go back to:

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Then:

Bunting - Drury - Noesen

Kotkaniemi can sit with Lemiuex until he gets his head right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Only line I like right now is:

Svechnikov - Aho - Teravainen

I’d like to land a 2C and have:

Necas - 2C - Jarvis

Then go back to:

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Then:

Bunting - Drury - Noesen

Kotkaniemi can sit with Lemiuex until he gets his head right

I can definitely get behind this.

I still think Aho and Jarvis play very well together. Haven't watched much, but how often have we run svech, aho, and Jarvis together?

We definitely need another top 6 forward though. Then either sit Drury or KK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

I can definitely get behind this.

I still think Aho and Jarvis play very well together. Haven't watched much, but how often have we run svech, aho, and Jarvis together?

We definitely need another top 6 forward though. Then either sit Drury or KK

I don’t remember the last time those three have played together, it’s been a while.

But a top six forward is needed and ideally it needs to be a center unless the plan is to play Necas or Jarvis there.

We essentially have one 1C (Aho) and three 3C’s (Drury, Staal, Kotkaniemi).

I feel like it’s taking its toll on Necas. He needs more skill around him to be successful and I think Bunting and Drury are your prototypical grinders.

I’d have loved to acquire Petterson and assuming Necas and Kotkaniemi (for cap purposes) we’re in the deal, we could have run something like this:

Svechnikov - Aho - Teravainen

Trade - Petterson - Jarvis

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Bunting - Drury - Noesen

Lemieux

 

That would give us two scoring lines, one shutdown line, and a very talented fourth line.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...