Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Officially Entering My Vote for WR Keon Coleman

chknwing

By chknwing,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, RumHam said:

i mean it's not going to happen this year. you can get high talent at G/C/TE right here and potentially ILB/DT. I have no issue with that. but reaching for a WR and we never draft WR good in the second round should be a red flag. Can also nab a RB here that's high, b/c these are just not positions highly valued on draft lists, but we can use literally any of these spots. 

well, I'm team offense.  I think the little we got should be geared toward fixing the biggest issue w/ the Panthers.  The cupboard is dry almost across the board on O.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mickeye76 Experienced

mickeye76

Posted
Posted

I like his WR partner Johnny Wilson a bit more. Wilson is a unicorn.  6'7" running a 4.5 at 225. He might be a reach at 33 and I have doubts he is going to last till 65.  So.. that's a conundrum. That said if we trade out of 33 but stay in that top 50 he is my target over even Keon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, NAS said:

Coleman will be a good possession receiver but won't stretch the field vertically 

We need a technical, savvy and gear changing WR with top end speed.  Coleman is a great contested catch guy, but the point is unless there is a busted coverage, most of his catches are contested.  We already have enough WRs that can't get separation.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

6-10 years?  By 10 years the original players are retiring or on the way towards retirement lol.  You don't need to hit on 53 players in the draft to build a roster.  If they know what they're doing, the team can be turned around in 2-3 seasons.  Probably more like 3 in this case.  You need to hit on a few picks and then fill in the rest however you can.  Great players have the effect of making the role players better.  For example, Derrick Brown made the entire defense better last year.  Our team sucks, but hitting on a few picks makes a world of difference.  We haven't really hit on any picks since Marty Hurney got fired a 2nd time.

The only time a rebuild takes 10 years is when it takes 7 or 8 years to hire the right people.

6-10 years to have a decent chunk of your two deep be contributing from the draft. Right now we are close to having none. That takes a LOT of time to remedy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...