Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurst cut


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Does not make sense but I’m not a cap expert. Thomas should absolutely go though 

Ian Thomas  would be 3.7 dead and 2.2 saved if cut according to Over the Cap

Think we should ride it out since it's just 1 year

Edited by jfra78
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SmokinwithWilly said:

At least they're trying to clean up the mess Fitts made. It's hard to really get a grip on how bad he fugged things up. 

It is comical how damn near every single major decision we have made in the past 5 or so years has ended up being the wrong choice all the way down. You have to be both incompetent and unlucky for things to work out as badly as they have for us.

  • Pie 7
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

It is comical how damn near every single major decision we have made in the past 5 or so years has ended up being the wrong choice all the way down. You have to be both incompetent and unlucky for things to work out as badly as they have for us.

Just can't hardly believe how bad it is and how we can't get out of our own way to screw it up even more. We need a bunch of good years to turn this around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

It is comical how damn near every single major decision we have made in the past 5 or so years has ended up being the wrong choice all the way down. You have to be both incompetent and unlucky for things to work out as badly as they have for us.

It's one of those times when fans can actually say that they could have done better than the GM and been 100% correct. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...