Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Giants looking to trade for Brian Burns


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

no--they are going after a QB, imo.  The fact that they did not want to give up a second (if true) is probably the reason this is dragging out.  They need it to move up.  I  am totally guessing, but if we take both seconds now, they can't move up as easy. 

I've got a perfect solution. How about we include in the package a QB who is worth not one, but TWO first round picks?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

I see Morgan's master plan about filling holes is making more of them??

Finding 2 starting edges is going to take years.

I knew no matter what the Panthers would lose in this Burns deal. 

We lost Burns months ago.  All that is left is trying to get something for him

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

I can deal with a 1st next year. We could be in a Bears situation with 2 top 5 picks.

 

Draft Sanders and the top WR. Hire Deion as HC.

 

*Just messing with you Linville. That would be your worst nightmare huh?

I think you are joking here, but that wouldn't be a nightmare scenario, it would be the final nail in the coffin of this franchise.

It would mean firing a coach for the 3rd straight year, to hire a guy who is NOT an NFL coach, his style won't work with NFL players, it only can work with college kids.  And then you'd be drafting his son and thus locking yourself into a situation for 3 years where you can't fire the coach no matter how bad it goes because it would then basically make your QB refuse to play for you if you did.

That's all also before even taking into consideration that Sanders is nowhere near as good as the hype around him is, if he was as good as the hype, Colorado wouldn't have been as bad as they were this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basbear said:

I see Morgan's master plan about filling holes is making more of them??

Finding 2 starting edges is going to take years.

I knew no matter what the Panthers would lose in this Burns deal. 

Find two mid level guys who can get you 5 sacks. Covers Burns production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...