Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Good FA so far minus Burns trade


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Frank9999 said:

Yeap, and Miles is gonna cook behind this new oline in Dave zone scheme 

Yeah. I think Miles is a good back. He's not a between the tackles runner. But he's elusive in space. Of course the Panthers tried to make him an inside runner. He also looked a lot more explosive after returning from the injury - hamstring I think.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frank9999 said:

Lol wut. Why do people keep acting like signing guards is bad. The saints made a living off this and that is why they had elite OLs. We needed serious depth regardless because look what happened this year. 
the guards we signed are massive and that is going to make our oline so much better

Id be all for a Laremy Tunsil or an all pro lineman. But marginally better (hunt) and not better (Lewis) is my beef. Stroud has a hall of fame LT which Bryce will probably never have

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ghostofdelhomme said:

Id be all for a Laremy Tunsil or an all pro lineman. But marginally better (hunt) and not better (Lewis) is my beef. Stroud has a hall of fame LT which Bryce will probably never have

Did you watch our guard play last year? Marginally better and not better? What are you smoking?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gapanthersfan said:

I can’t wait for Burns to start racking up the whiffs and missed tackles that go for big gains, just to behold the wrath of the NY media. I despise what he did to our team last season. 

I actually think he’ll probably have a pretty good season to prove the haters wrong or whatever motivation he’ll have. But, he wouldn’t have had the same season here if he had stayed. It would have been another mail it in season on the franchise tag playing not to get injured. Glad to have that bum ass attitude out of our locker room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Did you watch our guard play last year? Marginally better and not better? What are you smoking?

Which week? It was a turnstile every week with different bodies in and out with various injuries. I hope these new guys can stay healthy all year. That would be a big upgrade in itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't believe it's as easy as saying that anyone believes that Rico had the 10th best day on offense. Grades are done in a vacuum inasmuch as they can be. By their very nature, skill positions are always going to account for more "production" in reference to stats, and RBs perhaps even more than WRs because they touch the ball more. You can't look at PFF's grading system, or any football grading/grading system (like perhaps Football Outsiders or Next Gen Stats), so simplistically. If a player has an excellent day, relative to his position, relative to his assignments, and relative to his number of snaps, then he should be graded highly. It's up to the reader (or the analyst, if you will) to put what you're seeing into context, and that's not only in relation to the grades, but the general situation (like whether a player is playing injured, who they're playing with or against---the general situation). Even the fact that (presumably) PFF or news outlets put out a list of the highest and lowest grades, that doesn't mean that said players were the most impactful of the day, it just means that they did or didn't do their job the best, based upon a certain set of parameters. PFF is a part of life for football analysts, talking heads, execs, coaches, players, and even fans (even if indirectly), all to varying degrees. It is a tool that is used by all 32 teams. Obviously it's not viewed so dismissively by franchises as a whole. Execs obviously don't look at it as a bunch of bozos making sh¡t up on the fly. Fans can berate it or swear by it, but it isn't going anywhere.  The only thing that I can tell you is that perspective and context matters.
    • Im not big in to PFF but their guys were raving about his blocking along with our other skill players in the run game. https://youtu.be/D4kL_N97cFQ?si=sJWSZCUA1bj5otyx  
×
×
  • Create New...