Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Unnecessary Bluntness: Do Panthers already have a draft crush?


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, he is raw and is currently developing at a pretty significant rate.   So to me, he just doesn't compare to a Mingo.   They just were on two different protectories in college and coming into the draft. 

I mean, I want Mitchell, Ladd, the Texans boys, etc. at 33rd.  My Leggette talk is about getting him on a double dip in the 3rd.  If someone wants to draft him before that, so be it.   There is always a team, sometimes us, that over drafts someone out of need.  I just think WRs could fall in this one given how many good prospects their are. 

Im fine with taking him in the third.  This was mostly all in response to the people wanting him at 33 or saying he may not make it out of the first.  Mitchell or Chop Robinson are my #1 hopes for pick 33.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

This right here. Exactly why you cant just compare him to Mingo off measurables.

Im not, I'm comparing them off of their poor route running and lack of seperation and lateral quickness.  Its just a coincidence their measurables are really similar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

Im fine with taking him in the third.  This was mostly all in response to the people wanting him at 33 or saying he may not make it out of the first.  Mitchell or Chop Robinson are my #1 hopes for pick 33.

yeah, I don't want him at 33.  That's not good value.  I'm like you, Mitchell is my ideal get there. There are better WRs at 33.  Now, if you can get him in the 3rd round? That's a great value.   And I wouldn't be upset with 2 WRs in this class. 

I mean, they could draft Leggette and I love it....or they could draft him and I hate him.  Depends where you draft him.  Really anyone.  

I hated where they drafted Mingo and especially Johnson last year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Leggette, I go back to Brugler and a few others saying his stock quietly took a pretty big hit at Senior Bowl practices.

I’m not one to just roll with the trendy guy or what analysts are saying, but we need route running and a technician who can make an immediate impact along with that nice plus starter/all-pro upside. Play outside, inside. X, Z, slot. That is not Legette. He just gives me way too much pause at 33 or even 39. Mitchell, McConkey, Pearsall fit what I gravitate towards but we’ll see.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

Im not, I'm comparing them off of their poor route running and lack of seperation and lateral quickness.  Its just a coincidence their measurables are really similar. 

Legette plays physical and has speed, but he is not a savvy route runner who easily shakes man coverage — and that was at a college level. So move it to NFL and that all gets amplified. He does not fit what we need IMO.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Legette plays physical and has speed, but he is not a savvy route runner who easily shakes man coverage — and that was at a college level. So move it to NFL and that all gets amplified. He does not fit what we need IMO.

technically, every skill position on O is a need for us though.   Theilen and most likely Diontae....don't have the greatest odds of being around past this year. 

Bryce/Mingo are really the only guys that project out....and both of them were VERY disappointing as rookies.  Cupboard is pretty bare here.  I think we just need to add as much talent as possible.  BPA on O all draft. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Watching Legette’s film, I’m pretty underwhelmed at #33.  

3rd round, for sure.

but has a single poster even argued for Legette at 33?  Lots are arguing against taking him at 33. 

I mean, I guess there is the worry the Panthers could do Panther things and overdraft him though.  So I guess there is that.  Consensus here is that 33 is too high I would think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, top dawg said:

There are even more questions regarding Coleman's ability to be an X considering his lack of speed. I'm not going to post his strengths and weaknesses here (from the 33rd team which I find are critical, but probably fair), but he has more questions as to whether his traits will translate to the pros.

https://www.the33rdteam.com/keon-coleman-nfl-draft-2024-combine-results-scouting-report-for-florida-state-wr/

Looks like their rating and weaknesses are pretty similar on nfl.com. 

 

The mosy alarming for this offense. 

  • Below-average quickness getting in and out of his breaks.

You've convinced me on Coleman.....now I don't either of them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think you can afford to have a crush when there's gonna be 32 guys go ahead of you. Wel could package #33 and #39 to move up but I'd prefer we didn't. We need bodies, not just one guy. I'd rather have two top 40 guys than one top 15ish guy given our situation. 33+39 = roughly #14.

If a top ten guy drops to 15 range then it has to be a consideration

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

If a top ten guy drops to 15 range then it has to be a consideration

I think we have enough of a talent deficit I'd still rather have two top 40 at bats. Lord knows Panthers fans should understand by now that there's no such thing as a sure thing when it comes to draft picks. Trading 33 and 39 for a potential disappointment in the mid-teens is a dick punch this team can I'll afford to risk.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think we have enough of a talent deficit I'd still rather have two top 40 at bats. Lord knows Panthers fans should understand by now that there's no such thing as a sure thing when it comes to draft picks. Trading 33 and 39 for a potential disappointment in the mid-teens is a dick punch this team can I'll afford to risk.

Based on recent drafts, a dick-punch for #33 would be doable.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

technically, every skill position on O is a need for us though.   Theilen and most likely Diontae....don't have the greatest odds of being around past this year. 

Bryce/Mingo are really the only guys that project out....and both of them were VERY disappointing as rookies.  Cupboard is pretty bare here.  I think we just need to add as much talent as possible.  BPA on O all draft. 

Yeah I agree that we could use any type of receiver, but we have to prioritize the one's that don't need acclimation in respect to NFL-discipline, refined route running, and being a natural separator.  Those are the missing traits that have giant alarm bells blaring in this WR room that we didn't go for when drafting TMJ and Mingo.  

We've been picking ones that have the upside, good size, big time testers, but needed legit acclimation in respect to route running and/or in-game discipline.  We need the technicians and students of the game.   In my view, we absolutely need to favor that over the receivers that have the X potential, but don't necessarily have the high floor.    

I feel like McConkey & Pearsall have flashing green lights for whoever drafts them.  Both are instant top-15 route runners in the NFL once drafted, are lightning quick, playmakers, with measurables to boot.  

If we're talking 3rd-4th round, I could be down with Legette but this is a situation where he's not coming into start outside for us of the bat.  If we want instant impact, it's these Z/Slot switcher types.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...