Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Off-season so far ....


rayzor
 Share

personnel compared to last year  

98 members have voted

  1. 1. are we better off or worse off?

    • better
      96
    • worse
      2


Recommended Posts

 

Just looking at this full list (that you'll probably have to click to see) if the season started next week would we be better off than last year?

Yes, intentionally asking pre-draft choices and not taking into consideration coaching changes.

Is this team 'as is' better than it was?

Also, where do we still need to improve?

-10 points for the lazy answer of QB

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Need a 3rd option.  Unknown. 

Nah, I thought of a few other options, but I wanted it to be a case of "forced to choose, would you say it was better or worse"?

I know there are some other things to take into consideration, but just a snapshot of the roster last year and looking strictly at who we lost, kept, and obtained what does your gut say?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sure seems we are better, especially considering the OL upgrades and the addition of Johnson at WR.  Clowney is at worst a temporary wash with Burns. Probably actually a minor upgrade but only for the short term. Losing Luvu is a big downgrade but possibly made up for by the upgraded DL (notably Robinson) making it easier for the LBs. The secondary is looking worse on paper but we’ll see how it plays out. Troy Hill was a very nice surprise last year but he’s getting up there in age. 
 

Knowing what we know now, that the last coaching staff was a clusterfug and Reich was terrible/a terrible fit and Canales is a complete unknown, an unknown is better than a known disaster, so yea top to bottom we’re looking much improved this year from both a roster and coaching staff standpoint. 
 

We still need to improve the secondary, that’s the only thing on paper that really needs more work. TE is weak but not a necessity. LBs aren’t world beaters but if they stay healthy they’re sufficient. DL looks really strong and combined with scheming our pass rush should be no worse than last year (which wasn’t good), maybe even better.  Good enough. Our run defense was the problem last year and it should be significantly improved with the Robinson and Clowney additions. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say it's a push given my options. There's no way of telling.  Last season they thought they had an all-star staff. That was not true. This year it's "player upgrades". 

But having said that, it appears they have upgraded the oline and dline at a few spots. I love that mindset in team building but the results of player choices has yet to prove itself on the field. I'm also very doubtful of these new coaches. I'm hoping I am completely wrong about this staff but I do not think they will be able to pull this off.

So, I will say they got better at having a good plan but that's all I can give you until the season is over.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

looking at that list, it's a wash

if i'm an outsider looking in, we lost a bunch of nobodies and gained a bunch of nobodies. any names that are well known that left, were replaced with relatively similar (but older) names. maybe the o-line improved, but at the expense of other areas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

It would be hard to be worse than the worst team in the NFL like we were last year. So I will go with better. lol 

Honestly though, it could easily happen if Bryce doesn't improve.  The defense is definitely worse.  And those offensive additions won't mean a whole lot if we don't have at least average QB play.

I agree with the overall approach of focusing on the offense.  But we could definitely be worse than last year.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Honestly though, it could easily happen if Bryce doesn't improve.  The defense is definitely worse.  And those offensive additions won't mean a whole lot if we don't have at least average QB play.

I agree with the overall approach of focusing on the offense.  But we could definitely be worse than last year.

I do think it will be very hard for Young now that the NFL has so much tape on him. A sophomore slump is highly probable in my opinion. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On paper... they're easily better. A lot better. 

The only area that could remotely be worse is pass coverage, but an improved pass rush could help there. I'm not looking at the players lost/gained as individuals, but the mission area as a whole.

Run defense is improved drastically.

Pass rush is improved.

Pass protection is improved drastically.

Pass receivers improved drastically. I think David Moore makes a major contribution as he's a vet leader that is familiar with the offense. He's the Jerrico Cotchery from 2015.

Rush blocking is improved drastically.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rayzor said:

Not asking to argue, just curious about opinions. How is it worse?

I mean just on paper, losing Brian Burns and Frankie Luvu.  Maybe Jadaveon Clowney and Josie Jewell have monster seasons and they're even better.  But on paper I'd say we downgraded talent there.  I think they knew the defense would have to take a hit so the offense could be improved.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://sugardefenderscam.blogspot.com/2024/04/2024-sugar-defender-reviews-scam-what.html https://sites.google.com/view/sugar-defender-scam-2024/ https://gist.github.com/bephanik/586bf0f7d8601006d4cbfc7a6b7b5444 https://www.eventbrite.com/e/sugar-defender-reviews-do-not-miss-latest-customer-research-tickets-892121548567 https://www.scoop.it/topic/sugar-defender-reviews-high-quality-ingredients https://hackmd.io/@bephanik/ry_umBcWR https://vocal.media/art/sugar-defender-reviews-high-quality-ingredients https://medium.com/@jonsolye/sugar-defender-reviews-high-quality-ingredients-pros-cons-benefits-exposed-c390851c67b5 https://uberant.com/article/2011016-2024-sugar-defender-reviews-scam-what-you-need-to-know-before-buying/ https://msnho.com/blog/sugar-defender-reviews-ingredients-side-effects-official-website-2024 https://lu.ma/0pm0iahk https://www.eventogo.com/event/sugar-defender-is-it-a-safe-formula-for-maintaining-healthy-blood-sugar-levels/ https://crypto.jobs/events/sugar-defender-reviews-do-not-miss-latest-customer-research https://community.oneplus.com/thread/1583689797090672649 https://datacenterhub.org/projects/bephanik/ https://ekonty.com/blogs/view/50626/sugar-defender-reviews-ingredients-side-effects-official-website-2024 https://www.cureus.com/users/760793-sugar-defender-ingredients https://bio.link/bephanik https://www.instapaper.com/p/14229922 https://solo.to/bephanik https://magic.ly/bephanik https://kaancy.com/sugar-defender-reviews-complaints/ https://patch.com/new-york/east-village/calendar/event/20240429/a5eb9170-fee0-4a86-997e-d147165e0e1c/sugar-defender-reviews-high-quality-ingredients-pros-cons-benefits-exposed https://yamcode.com/fitnessconnectionsadad http://bephanik.zohosites.com/ https://znanija.com/task/55605163 https://pantip.com/topic/42672314 https://tudomuaban.com/chi-tiet-rao-vat/2082881/sugar-defender-reviews---is-it-legit-for-blood-sugar-support.html https://www.carolinahuddle.com/topic/252175-sugar-defender-reviews-complaints-sugar-defender-ingredients-warning-alert/ https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/aussie-nz-mumsnetters/5063293-sugar-defender-reviews-is-it-legit-for-blood-sugar-support https://feedback.bistudio.com/T180766 https://kbin.social/u/bephanik https://haitiliberte.com/advert/sugar-defender-reviews-is-it-legit-for-blood-sugar-support/ https://tigerbait.com/forums/4/topics/16679/replies/90316 https://uniquethis.com/profile/bephanik https://www.expatriates.com/cls/55977054.html https://teeshopper.in/products/Sugar-Defender-Reviews-High-Quality-Ingredients-Pros-Cons-Benefits-Exposed https://eodev.com/gorev/29643056 https://public.flourish.studio/story/2354619/ https://yoomark.com/content/sugar-defender-reviews-high-quality-ingredients https://devfolio.co/projects/sugar-defender-reviews-ingredients-side-effects-0cf4 https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/sugar-defender-reviews-high-quality-ingredients-31fceb57ebd146218e62cf59f1971d4f https://grabcad.com/library/sugar-defender-reviews-is-it-legit-for-blood-sugar-support-1   https://soundcloud.com/bephanik/sugar-defender-reviews-is-it-legit-for-blood-sugar-support https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/cd63b3f5-8404-ef11-a81c-0022481adee7 https://middlesexcountynj.powerappsportals.us/forums/support-forum/e4171458-8504-ef11-a73d-001dd80b215a https://forum.teknofest.az/d/21456-sugar-defender-reviews-high-quality-ingredients https://forum.instube.com/d/91895-sugar-defender-reviews-is-it-legit-for-blood-sugar-support https://herbalmeds-forum.biolife.com.my/d/51604-sugar-defender-reviews-ingredients-side-effects-official-website-2024 https://forum.artrix.pl/d/20143-ghfgjhfgjhjjyjutyujhtyujhty https://electricsheep.activeboard.com/t70668469/asedfgdrgdrtghrtfhrtfgh/ https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2487420 https://www.weddingwire.com/wedding-forums/sugar-defender-reviews-the-ultimate-solution-for-blood-sugar-management/b29849108c3997f1.html https://www.giantbomb.com/forums/general-discussion-30/httpssugardefenderscamblogspotcom-1919865/ https://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/gen-discussion-1/sugar-defender-reviews-high-quality-ingredients-2340095/ https://forum.adblockplus.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=97599&sid=6fb5695da44c2805e4e44b7dd4be8f3b https://www.mobafire.com/league-of-legends/forum/general/sugar-defender-reviews-do-not-miss-latest-customer-research-46811 https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/Adverts/Question1868367.html https://army.ca/forums/threads/sugar-defender-is-it-a-safe-formula-for-maintaining-healthy-blood-sugar-levels.146699/ https://forum.rainmeter.net/viewtopic.php?t=43982 https://minecraftcommand.science/forum/discussions/topics/sugar-defender-reviews-blood-sugar-support-drops-frmula https://plarium.com/forum/en/mech-arena/702_game-discussion/1697181_sugar-defender-reviews---is-it-legit-for-blood-sugar-support/ https://forums.hitched.co.uk/chat/forums/thread/2024-sugar-defender-reviews-scam-what-you-need-to-know-before-buying-1179619/ https://forum.theknightonline.com/threads/https-www-eventbrite-com-e-sugar-defender-reviews-alert-read-before-buying-amiclear-blood-sugar-tickets-892107105367.438412/ https://wmasg.com/pl/forum/topic/219252-sugar-defender-reviews-is-it-legit-for-blood-sugar-support/ https://www.steelernationforum.com/threads/sugar-defender-reviews-the-ultimate-solution-for-blood-sugar-management.56490/ https://kozosseg.telekom.hu/topic/40784-sugar-defender-reviews-high-quality-ingredients-pros-cons/
    • I’ve seen other places that had him as a top 75 player and the potential to be an elite nfl lb
×
×
  • Create New...