Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seeking Insights on RB and TE


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello pals and close impersonal friends,

As we progress towards the draft, it seems to me that this off-season and the draft will be dedicated to providing Bryce with all the weapons he needs to be successful.   We all jumped to OL and WR, and rightly so.  However, do we have that game-changing RB and a TE threat that are good enough to qualify as "weapons?"  If we are truly going to give Bryce the weaponry he needs, can we say that we have done that with our current roster in the area of TE and RB?

When I mock, I am focused on CB, WR, LB--and many mocks I do not have a RB or TE. 

TE:  Last year, Dalton Kincaid, Sam LaPorta, and Luke Musgrave were successful in year 1.  A few others, such as Mayer, Washington, and Schoonmaker disappointed as rookies, but for the most part, first year TEs were successful.   In my view, there is one sure thing at TE in this draft and there is another who should be on the level of Kincaid and LaPorta--TE Sanders from Texas.   If we want to upgrade at TE, we need him, in my view.  Or we should probably start Tremble and hope that his improvement continues.

  • Q: Is there a TE in this draft that will make us better?  Should we continue to bring along Tremble? 

RB:  Chubba Hubbard had 900 yards last season, but he averaged a meager 3.8 yards.  Of course, with the new OL, that should improve. Sanders shows us what running behind an outstanding OL can do for your career.  He averaged 3.3 yards per carry and fumbled about once every 65 carries (2 fumbles, 129 carries).  However, before coming to Carolina, Sanders averaged 4.8 yards per carry.   His numbers should improve with the new OL. 

  • Do we need a feature RB?  Do we need a bowling ball or a Swiss Army knife?  Can we assume that our RB production will improve with our $150m guards? 

OVERARCHING QUESTION:  Is it reasonable to assume that the best "bang for the buck" (players likely to see extensive, meaningful playing time as starters or key rotational players) is to focus on TE, RB, and one more WR?   

UNDERARCHING RHETORICAL QUESTION:  Has MHS lost his mind? 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have much respect for Chubba.  He is a hard-nosed, down hill runner that isn't terrible in the passing game.  I don't feel he is a feature back. 

Most elite offenses don't have a bell cow feature back.  So we should draft another RB anyways. Not sure where the value will line up with the pick.  It will also be interesting to see what kind of RB that D&D target. 

I'm also always for adding a talented TE.  It would be nice to see Tremble blossom to be a consistent threat in the passing game.  He doesn't have to have 1000 yard seasons. Just be consistent, and get first downs and TDs. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

We don't need someone to carry the load at RB.  But, we could use one that is strong as a receiver to pair with Chuba.  If there is someone like that late in the draft, I would think about taking them.

Take a look at the RB from KY ray Davis.  Small and bowling ball ish  and can catch.   could be there in 4th.  Great story--was homeless, etc.  https://www.nfl.com/prospects/ray-davis/32004441-5663-2804-a8ce-2174ee79562e

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn’t put Sanders close to Kincaid or La Porta. I don’t think he’s worth a 2nd. It would be a big kick in the nuts if we go TE this year instead of last year. TE should have been last year instead of Mingo. This is why we’ve sucked so bad lately. We overdraft at positions that aren’t deep instead of targeting guys who fall because it’s a deep class. Kincaid and La Porta had great seasons for rookies. TEs don’t typically have great production as rookies, even the great ones.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Canales, he gave Rachaad White almost 300 carries and nearly 60 targets receiving.  And factor in our new prized possession in Hunt- he led the top-running OL in Miami that was paving lanes for Achane/Mostert to amass almost 2,000 rushing yards in a wide zone scheme.  Note they had McDaniel and the speed at WR and RB to help stretch the field in multiple different ways.   

We just don't have the guy to fit the bill. Chuba and Miles aren't forcing any defense to adjust.  

Getting a feature back that can hit home runs is super critical to any success we'll have.  I would not be surprised if one of 5 (Brooks, Corum, Benson, Wright or Lloyd) ends up on this team as our new main guy whose name you'll hear quite a lot moving forward.  

 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Canales ran this man into the dirt.  Nearly 300 carries at 3.6 average lmao.

Yeah.  They didn't have much else there--White isn't that good a runner and Edmunds was the backup who's pretty bad.  And had a bit lackluster OL in respect to a ground game.  Yet he was still strongly dedicated to the ground game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The moment we drafted Bryce....slot WR, TE, and rec RB IMO were the 3 key positions for him to succeed.   And we have failed him in those 3 spots.   Bryce is suppose to be a PG dink and dunker IMO.  So you need YAC guys at those spots. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

I’d rather take the chance that Sanders rebounds rather than take a RB in the draft (unless it’s like 5th round). 

if Sanders rebounds.....he still is one of the worst receiving RBs in the NFL.  Because that what he was in 2 of the last 3 seasons in Philly and ultimately why they parted with him.   We aren't meshing talented with our QB.  Bryce needs diverse RBs that can catch and make plays.  

We need what Cohen was in Chicago pre injury.   

We need to draft RB talent.  Rounds 3 or 4 is where you build your backfield IMO.  We should always be adding talent.  We should quit with FA RBs. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...