Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Call The Shot" Playoff Challenge


Anybodyhome
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, organicrusty1201 said:

my thoughts exactly- Varlamov won't be giving up long range shots - so I'll go Jarvy with the tip

And it’s Jarvis with the tip. (On further review it was a shot by Jarvy. I thought he tipped a rebound in but he picked the post perfect. Still a point though!)
 

1 point OrganicCrusty. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

I'm back and without, much fanfare, 4 games into Round 1 we finally have a winner!

Technically, there are no "standings" since only 1 person has picked a winner. Nonetheless...

organicrusty1201             carolina-hurricanes-nhl-decals.jpg.23960b9a6c8042cac95be8bb3eaa50c9.jpg

... and everyone else.... nothing.

To add on further

G1: Kuz

G2: Turbo

G3: Burns

G4: Jarvis(OrganicCrusty)

G5: ???

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...