Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Day of Draft Rumors


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Before I head into work-some things I've seen floating around today:

  • Daniels seems a lock at #2
  • Pats seem locked on Maye at #3, AZ with Marv at #4
  • LAC-Latham love is real, but fans want Nabers - To trade or not to trade?
  • Philly has multiple people thinking they're trading up, same with the Cards from Pick 27
  • Falcons are definitely taking calls at 8 depending on who's available 
  • Bills are making calls and want a receiver

Feel free to add more as things trickle in today - looking at you tweet embedders (+Juan)

https://theathletic.com/5440564/2024/04/24/nfl-draft-rumors-news-latest/

 

Is no-one worried that Daniels is going to be a 24 year old rookie?

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

 

"You have to help Bryce".

He's beyond saving.

Just pick BPA, regardless of position, and get this rebuild started properly. We're down multiple premium picks with zero NFL QBs on the roster. Stop digging. 

Edited by OldhamA
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Is no-one worried that Daniels is going to be a 24 year old rookie?

Agree, older QBs that started for 4-5 years scare me. They might look good year 1, but year 2 usually rough.

I mean, what is their untapped potential and upside? The last 1-2 years have been men playing against boys.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those of us screaming for a WR on day 2, there is this:

Day 2 WRs drafted by Panthers (round)

2023:  Jonathan Mingo (2)

2021: Terrace Marshall Jr. (2)

2017: Curtis Samuel (2)

2015: Devin Funchess (2)

2010: Brandon Lafell (3); Armanti Edwards (3)

2007: Dwayne Jarrett (2)

2004: Keary Colbert (2)

2001: Steve Smith (3)

1997: Muhsin Muhammad (2)

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

For those of us screaming for a WR on day 2, there is this:

Day 2 WRs drafted by Panthers (round)

2023:  Jonathan Mingo (2)

2021: Terrace Marshall Jr. (2)

2017: Curtis Samuel (2)

2015: Devin Funchess (2)

2010: Brandon Lafell (3); Armanti Edwards (3)

2007: Dwayne Jarrett (2)

2004: Keary Colbert (2)

2001: Steve Smith (3)

1997: Muhsin Muhammad (2)

Moooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooose

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

For those of us screaming for a WR on day 2, there is this:

Day 2 WRs drafted by Panthers (round)

2023:  Jonathan Mingo (2)

2021: Terrace Marshall Jr. (2)

2017: Curtis Samuel (2)

2015: Devin Funchess (2)

2010: Brandon Lafell (3); Armanti Edwards (3)

2007: Dwayne Jarrett (2)

2004: Keary Colbert (2)

2001: Steve Smith (3)

1997: Muhsin Muhammad (2)

Sadly we are 2 for 10 based on this list....sure hope Morgan has a better eye

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

For those of us screaming for a WR on day 2, there is this:

Day 2 WRs drafted by Panthers (round)

2023:  Jonathan Mingo (2) NO SEPARATION

2021: Terrace Marshall Jr. (2) NO SEPARATION

2017: Curtis Samuel (2) has been better--was decent

2015: Devin Funchess (2) NO SEPARATION

2010: Brandon Lafell (3) OK, small hands; Armanti Edwards (3) route running, small

2007: Dwayne Jarrett (2) NO SEPARATION

2004: Keary Colbert (2) NO SEPARATION

2001: Steve Smith (3)

1997: Muhsin Muhammad (2)

I added a few comments about each that I recall or have recently read  See comments above---I had to go back and read articles etc. about Colbert, Jarrett, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Moooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooose

Moose and Smith are the reason we were in the Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

Is no-one worried that Daniels is going to be a 24 year old rookie?

They should be. The track record of these older one year wonders is atrocious. You basically have Joe Burrow to the positive and practically everyone else to the negative. You're talking about guys who are the age of most second year and some third year NFL players playing against college kids. You gotta grade them with a curve that reflects that.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Martin said:

Agree, older QBs that started for 4-5 years scare me. They might look good year 1, but year 2 usually rough.

I mean, what is their untapped potential and upside? The last 1-2 years have been men playing against boys.

I think that Caleb is going to be good.  After that, it depends where they go:
Maye  If he goes to Minnesota or the Giants, he has a better supporting staff than Daniels will in Washington.  New England would not be the best situation for Maye, imo.  He will be able to watch for a season in NY--possibly in Minnesota.  If Daniels goes to Washington, he will be on his own, but the Commanders have a lot of draft capital. 

Penix is not going to do well in Vegas until they get the OL worked out.  However, he can sit for a season there. 

  I see them as a potential trading partner with Carolina:

Washington picks in top 100:

  • Round 1 (2)
  • Round 2 (36)
  • Round 2 (40)
  • Round 3 (67)
  • Round 3 (78)
  • Round 3 (100)

McCarthy is going to land in a pretty good situation.  Either the Giants (where he will sit for a season) or Minnesota is better than Washington or New England.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...