Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Panthers insider leaks pick #39


Recommended Posts

Just now, MHS831 said:

I am guessing we might have a shot at Kool-Aid or Saintrisil.  I am really getting tired of last names that are difficult to pronounce//remember.

We seem to like Saintrisil a lot and he would make a good leader on the defense.  Still seems a little high for a strictly NB, but maybe he can play some outside as well just undersized?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

We seem to like Saintrisil a lot and he would make a good leader on the defense.  Still seems a little high for a strictly NB, but maybe he can play some outside as well just undersized?

Outside wise - check out Sainristil against Marvin Jr. when Johnson went down in that crazy game. 

He held his own against one of the top WR prospect in forever, at hair under 5'10.  The year prior, same rivalry game, a moment at NB, had to stack up in the slot against a 6'4 250 TE in Stover and had one of the best plays you'll see to swat the ball away from the defender in a crucial moment in the endzone.  As with any guy he has misses on tape, but his highs are big highs in big moments.  

And between Evero's penny front (the nickel 3-3-5 we disguise as a 5-1), dime, and our other subpackages, he loves using slot corners and runs heavy zone with high % blitzes.   We really haven't had ideal guys for him yet --did get some who had experience in the system like Hill.  Chinn was tried a bit and didn't work out, others rotated in but we never found our long term answer.  And that's the bulk of our defensive snaps.  We have 6 DBs on the field quite a lot.    

And historically, Evero seems preferential and totally fine with shorter DBs.  Interestingly-Who is the best rated zone DB in the draft? Sainristil (at least according to pff).  Not to mention being the captain, spoke of as a coach amongst players, being a tough willing blitzer, solid/aggressive run defender, and the best ballhawk on his team (one of the top in the country).  He made big plays in big games.   Lot's of good IMO, but yes, slot corner high is a ballsy move.

Some good info: https://theathletic.com/5392472/2024/04/05/raiders-nfl-draft-prospects-mike-sainristil/

One of the articles that sold me--

Quote

“He was pissing me off — he was calling out formations, routes,” McMillan said at the NFL Scouting Combine last month.

 

Quote

“He’s an undersized nickel who can probably give you some time at safety,” The Athletic draft writer Nick Baumgardner said. “More importantly, though, there’s not a better defensive leader/table setter in this class than Mike Sainristil. (He’s) extremely intelligent in coverage and a fearless run defender who also caused problems as a blitzer.”

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Outside wise - check out Sainristil against Marvin Jr. when Johnson went down in that crazy game. 

He held his own against one of the top WR prospect in forever, at hair under 5'10.  The year prior, same rivalry game, a moment at NB, had to stack up in the slot against a 6'4 250 TE in Stover and had one of the best plays you'll see to swat the ball away from the defender in a crucial moment in the endzone.  As with any guy he has misses on tape, but his highs are big highs in big moments.  

And between Evero's penny front (the nickel 3-3-5 we disguise as a 5-1), dime, and our other subpackages, he loves using slot corners and runs heavy zone with high % blitzes.   We really haven't had ideal guys for him yet --did get some who had experience in the system like Hill.  Chinn was tried a bit and didn't work out, others rotated in but we never found our long term answer.  And that's the bulk of our defensive snaps.  We have 6 DBs on the field quite a lot.    

And historically, Evero seems preferential and totally fine with shorter DBs.  Interestingly-Who is the best rated zone DB in the draft? Sainristil (at least according to pff).  Not to mention being the captain, spoke of as a coach amongst players, being a tough willing blitzer, solid/aggressive run defender, and the best ballhawk on his team (one of the top in the country).  He made big plays in big games.   Lot's of good IMO, but yes, slot corner high is a ballsy move.

Some good info: https://theathletic.com/5392472/2024/04/05/raiders-nfl-draft-prospects-mike-sainristil/

One of the articles that sold me--

 

 

Ok I’m sold! Gimme! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

Ok I’m sold! Gimme! 

Not everyone will be fans of a slot corner early, but I'm personally sold on the player.

Thing is, ILB is critical for our two-high shell.  They need to be fast sideline to sideline, be able to close in quickly, hover all over and Shaq coming off injury scares me.  

Colson or Cooper could make a lot of sense.  Don't know how we'd do if we're looking at journeymen at LB this year.  Very important for the Fangio disciple defenses.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bear Hands said:

Not everyone will be fans of a slot corner early, but I'm personally sold on the player.

Thing is, ILB is critical for our two-high shell.  They need to be fast sideline to sideline, be able to close in quickly, hover all over and Shaq coming off injury scares me.  

Colson or Cooper could make a lot of sense.  Don't know how we'd do if we're looking at journeymen at LB this year.  Very important for the Fangio disciple defenses.  

we need a starter at 39

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Not everyone will be fans of a slot corner early, but I'm personally sold on the player.

Thing is, ILB is critical for our two-high shell.  They need to be fast sideline to sideline, be able to close in quickly, hover all over and Shaq coming off injury scares me.  

Colson or Cooper could make a lot of sense.  Don't know how we'd do if we're looking at journeymen at LB this year.  Very important for the Fangio disciple defenses.  

If not one of the centers, Cooper/Wilson/Colson are my preference. 

Edited by JawnyBlaze
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

we need a starter at 39

Just depends I suppose how you qualify starter when there's a NB who can play the star role that would be in there at a higher snap % than some technical starters.  

There's about 7-9 always out there--Both ILBs, two starting S, two outside CBs, 2 of the 3 DL, 1 of the two EDGE guys.  Our remaining edge rotation and 3rd-4th DBs are still pretty much starters.  

But sure, if we have an outside corner we love, I imagine that would take precedent (I.E. Kool-Aid or Tampa).  Same goes if they think Kneeland is a 3-down guy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bear Hands said:

Just depends I suppose how you qualify starter when there's a NB who can play the star role would be in there at a higher snap % than some technical starters.  

There's about 7-9 always out there--Both ILBs, two starting S, two outside CBs, 2 of the 3 DL, 1 of the two EDGE guys.  Our remaining edge rotation and 3rd-4th DBs are still pretty much starters.  

But sure, if we have an outside corner we love, I imagine that would take precedent (I.E. Kool-Aid or Tampa).  Same goes if they think Kneeland is a 3-down guy.  

a top center would be aces.  If we dont go center at some point and when corbett goes down, this entire revamped line is at the mercy of whoever they sign off the street

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

a top center would be aces.  If we dont go center at some point and when corbett goes down, this entire revamped line is at the mercy of whoever they sign off the street

Ah - yeah I got sucked in thinking only about defense haha.  Totally fair.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...