Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers trade back from #39 to #52


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, chknwing said:

Carolina didnt have a 2nd next year, they got one by moving a few spots.  Im ok with this

When we picking  in the second next year all this will be forgotten. I like the trade. I like the extra 5th too. That could be our sleeper TE or RB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UnluckyforSome said:

It's a good trade. It gives us an extra chance to pick a not-as-terrible player to replace a worse player on the team.


Lol…we’ll need that 2nd rounder to replace the one we’re about the draft.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this a good trade value wise? 100%. 

Do I have any faith whatsoever that this organization will do something good with it. Not at all. 

That’s pretty much me in a nutshell with this team right now. years ago I would have been super excited about this. I now feel like a battered wife. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Montsta said:

Is this a good trade value wise? 100%. 

Do I have any faith whatsoever that this organization will do something good with it. Not at all. 

That’s pretty much me in a nutshell with this team right now. years ago I would have been super excited about this. I now feel like a battered wife. 

Panthers version of snipe hunting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Montsta said:

Is this a good trade value wise? 100%. 

Do I have any faith whatsoever that this organization will do something good with it. Not at all. 

That’s pretty much me in a nutshell with this team right now. years ago I would have been super excited about this. I now feel like a battered wife. 

This is so perfect lmaoooo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sellers is absolutely one to keep an eye on. Could be the next Cam or could be the next Anthony Richardson. Curious to see how he has progressed come this fall.
    • I think Texas could go 0-12 and he would still go #1 based on his name and traits like you say.  But nusselman and sellers may be actually better qbs.    Man if bryce stinks it up this season its looking like a damn good year to swap out qbs.  Sellers highlights are just fuging jaw dropping
    • I mean, the kid comes from a wealthy family. It's not like he needs the money. He has a ton of potential now we get to see what he can do as a starter. Everyone penciling him in as the #1 overall pick is putting the cart way before the horse. It's 5% because of his talent and what he's showing on the field and 95% because his last name is Manning. And if he is what he's hyped to be the Texas coaching staff needs to be answering some tough questions about why the kid wasn't on the field sooner. Ewers was a good college QB but he's definitely not a "keep a future #1 overall pick waiting" type of college QB. Only getting one season out of a top NFL talent because you chose to keep him buried behind a borderline NFL talent is just coaching negligence. Not starting him as a true freshman? Yeah, I get that. But on year two if the kids is what he's hyped to be you gotta wish Ewers well elsewhere and turn the page.
×
×
  • Create New...