Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does anyone actually think Bryce will actually be good?


Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I don't think you are allowed to use facts.

Want to see something crazy?  Look in Bryce stats after Dallas game.  They parked Bryce and told him to play conservative.

Bryce first 9 games: 9 TDs, 8 Int, ~1,600 total yards.  

Bryce last 8 games: 2 TD, 2 Int, ~1,600 total yards.  With just 1 game over 200 yards passing.  If you remove that game… Bryce is 0 TDs, 2 Int, and 1,300 total yards in 7 games.

Just disaster the way the handled him.  Dude regressed as the season went on.  He took zero chances after bye week.  Just stayed in the pocket and got pounded.

His confidence got sucked out just by looking at his stats.

Edited by Lame Duck
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lame Duck said:

Want to see something crazy?  Look in Bryce stats after Dallas game.  They parked Bryce and told him to play conservative.

Bryce first 9 games: 9 TDs, 8 Int, ~1,600 total yards.  

Bryce last 8 games: 2 TD, 2 Int, ~1,600 total yards.  With just 1 game over 200 yards passing.  If you remove that game… Bryce is 0 TDs, 2 Int, and 1,300 total yards in 7 games.

Just disaster the way the handled him.  Dude regressed as the season went on.  He took zero chance.  Just stayed in the pocket and got pounded.

 

Or its more likely coordinators got film on him and turned the screws

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

No just 1st overall picks. My point is that just because they are the 1st overall pick doesn't guarantee a damn thing. Doesn't mean anything other than a team had their choice and picked them 1st. Doesn't make them super human and a guaranteed franchise changer. History teaches us that to those that choose to listen. 

So where does the trade up come into play in this? I think Goff was the only other major trade up for a QB at no.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Or its more likely coordinators got film on him and turned the screws

He got progressively worse after Reich got fired.  I think Tepper screwed up.  It’s no coincidence.  Brown was a complete dog crap of a coordinator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lame Duck said:

He got progressively worse after Reich got fired.  I think Tepper screwed up.  It’s no coincidence.  Brown was a complete dog crap of a coordinator.

I mean his OC’s wife publicly said he was already shutting it down…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Or its more likely coordinators got film on him and turned the screws

Normally that would make sense, but I think defenses played him like a rookie all year and dared him to throw.  Press up on our WRs who can't separate and send pressure right up the middle. The Falcons week 1 let their safety free play in the box and just read Bryce.  Do you recall any early games where the defenses were playing for the deep pass?  I honestly don't...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

So where does the trade up come into play in this? I think Goff was the only other major trade up for a QB at no.1

The trade up compounds the mistake. It's bad enough when you've earned your way organically to that pick. But when you trade up for it? You better get the best of the bunch. And then that player may not live up to the expectations of being the franchise savior. There's no saving some franchises but 1 player never solves enough to get you over the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has any QB taken with the  Number 1, acquired by trade, ever killed it? I think the people that are considered generational will never be acquired that way, a team won’t trade. (which makes trading into it more suspect)

Okay I looked because I could not remember a QB taken number one where the pick was traded to their team, ever having the career that was envisioned. 

I thought Vick was the #2 but n o he was the 1st pick. I didn’t look at the price but if he hadn’t fought those dogs he would have been one.

Coincidentally, Steve Bartkowski in 1775 and also an Atlanta selection, is the other. 

I don’t think Goff was a real satisfying selection either but we are talking multiple draft picks and the 1st overall selection is expected be special going into the proposition. 

What I remember of Bartkowski is he was that really good QB stuck on a crappy team. I think he wopuld be my choice of the three fwiw, to be worth the investment. Maybe not, it was a long time ago. Memory. 

Since 1967

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/35429888/nfl-draft-no-1-pick-trade-history-1967-every-top-selection-changed-teams

 

A footnote: Chicago has an opportunity to nail it with a Number 1 acquired by trade, this year. dammit. We’ll see how that goes. 

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

The trade up compounds the mistake. It's bad enough when you've earned your way organically to that pick. But when you trade up for it? You better get the best of the bunch. And then that player may not live up to the expectations of being the franchise savior. There's no saving some franchises but 1 player never solves enough to get you over the top.

Niners are the only recent team to trade up a haul and still survive after the pick didn't work out.  It's also just not very common so it's not a real good sample size...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Coker has certainly earned it. Good for him.
    • I don't think we don't call things aggressively, for a Canales offense, anyway. We don't have a QB who makes aggressive throws nor stresses defenses downfield. He is at a career low on 20+ attempts per game and his career 10-20 QB rating is abysmal.  That will always be a limiting factor IF you are looking for a high flying, downfield offense. I am not even that concerned about it, I just want to see effective offense and we decidedly do not possess that. A large chunk of that is Bryce. I think the second biggest chunk is Canales. All the other components(XL included) are fairly minor in comparison to those two things. I am an advocate of attempting to improve at QB. I am not focused on finding "The QB." We failed at that with Bryce. So let's just get better. If that's a one year vet or a draftee or a cheap trade or some combination of any/all, we should do that. We have to get that QB better. Bryce will fail in 2026 and we need to have REALISTIC options to take over when that happens. That ain't Andy Dalton or Hendon Hooker or Jack Plummer or Mike White or....you get the picture. Be serious about hedging that Bryce bet and not just having to make do if he struggles or gets injured.  My mind is definitely made up on Canales. It's year two and he hasn't improved much, nor do I think the bones of a good HC are there. Ron Rivera got to that point after two seasons and he was open about the changes he had to make and advice he got to make that leap in year 3. If we don't see the same after next year, how is he not just Brian Daboll?
    • Not really buying it because T-mac faces stiffer competition week in and week out. 
×
×
  • Create New...