Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does anyone actually think Bryce will actually be good?


Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I don't think you are allowed to use facts.

Want to see something crazy?  Look in Bryce stats after Dallas game.  They parked Bryce and told him to play conservative.

Bryce first 9 games: 9 TDs, 8 Int, ~1,600 total yards.  

Bryce last 8 games: 2 TD, 2 Int, ~1,600 total yards.  With just 1 game over 200 yards passing.  If you remove that game… Bryce is 0 TDs, 2 Int, and 1,300 total yards in 7 games.

Just disaster the way the handled him.  Dude regressed as the season went on.  He took zero chances after bye week.  Just stayed in the pocket and got pounded.

His confidence got sucked out just by looking at his stats.

Edited by Lame Duck
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lame Duck said:

Want to see something crazy?  Look in Bryce stats after Dallas game.  They parked Bryce and told him to play conservative.

Bryce first 9 games: 9 TDs, 8 Int, ~1,600 total yards.  

Bryce last 8 games: 2 TD, 2 Int, ~1,600 total yards.  With just 1 game over 200 yards passing.  If you remove that game… Bryce is 0 TDs, 2 Int, and 1,300 total yards in 7 games.

Just disaster the way the handled him.  Dude regressed as the season went on.  He took zero chance.  Just stayed in the pocket and got pounded.

 

Or its more likely coordinators got film on him and turned the screws

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

No just 1st overall picks. My point is that just because they are the 1st overall pick doesn't guarantee a damn thing. Doesn't mean anything other than a team had their choice and picked them 1st. Doesn't make them super human and a guaranteed franchise changer. History teaches us that to those that choose to listen. 

So where does the trade up come into play in this? I think Goff was the only other major trade up for a QB at no.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Or its more likely coordinators got film on him and turned the screws

He got progressively worse after Reich got fired.  I think Tepper screwed up.  It’s no coincidence.  Brown was a complete dog crap of a coordinator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lame Duck said:

He got progressively worse after Reich got fired.  I think Tepper screwed up.  It’s no coincidence.  Brown was a complete dog crap of a coordinator.

I mean his OC’s wife publicly said he was already shutting it down…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Or its more likely coordinators got film on him and turned the screws

Normally that would make sense, but I think defenses played him like a rookie all year and dared him to throw.  Press up on our WRs who can't separate and send pressure right up the middle. The Falcons week 1 let their safety free play in the box and just read Bryce.  Do you recall any early games where the defenses were playing for the deep pass?  I honestly don't...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

So where does the trade up come into play in this? I think Goff was the only other major trade up for a QB at no.1

The trade up compounds the mistake. It's bad enough when you've earned your way organically to that pick. But when you trade up for it? You better get the best of the bunch. And then that player may not live up to the expectations of being the franchise savior. There's no saving some franchises but 1 player never solves enough to get you over the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has any QB taken with the  Number 1, acquired by trade, ever killed it? I think the people that are considered generational will never be acquired that way, a team won’t trade. (which makes trading into it more suspect)

Okay I looked because I could not remember a QB taken number one where the pick was traded to their team, ever having the career that was envisioned. 

I thought Vick was the #2 but n o he was the 1st pick. I didn’t look at the price but if he hadn’t fought those dogs he would have been one.

Coincidentally, Steve Bartkowski in 1775 and also an Atlanta selection, is the other. 

I don’t think Goff was a real satisfying selection either but we are talking multiple draft picks and the 1st overall selection is expected be special going into the proposition. 

What I remember of Bartkowski is he was that really good QB stuck on a crappy team. I think he wopuld be my choice of the three fwiw, to be worth the investment. Maybe not, it was a long time ago. Memory. 

Since 1967

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/35429888/nfl-draft-no-1-pick-trade-history-1967-every-top-selection-changed-teams

 

A footnote: Chicago has an opportunity to nail it with a Number 1 acquired by trade, this year. dammit. We’ll see how that goes. 

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

The trade up compounds the mistake. It's bad enough when you've earned your way organically to that pick. But when you trade up for it? You better get the best of the bunch. And then that player may not live up to the expectations of being the franchise savior. There's no saving some franchises but 1 player never solves enough to get you over the top.

Niners are the only recent team to trade up a haul and still survive after the pick didn't work out.  It's also just not very common so it's not a real good sample size...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...