Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs rags rd 2 game 6 7pm Thursday


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jaxel said:

Rangers gameplay is to beat the crap put of the hurricanes to wear them out the next game. We are taking a lot of hits.

They was being more physical to try and wear out the team so they didn’t get blitzed again in the late 3rd. They just got blitzed early instead because they had to play fast to get all the hits

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Rangers gameplay is to beat the crap put of the hurricanes to wear them out the next game. We are taking a lot of hits.

Takes more energy to play in that manner, we are dodging hits and looking clean. 

Edited by Popsickle
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

KokomMiami is having a hell of a game. Also Chatty and Orlov for 3rd pair (really 2nd with Pesce out) is just insane, such a huge upgrade on recent years. TDA has been great the last few games after early struggles, so we really have no weak link on D. Meanwhile the Rags have had like 4 weak links on D. Sadly this will probably be the last year we’re this deep on the blue line with the impending FAs

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, t96 said:

KokomMiami is having a hell of a game. Also Chatty and Orlov for 3rd pair (really 2nd with Pesce out) is just insane, such a huge upgrade on recent years. TDA has been great the last few games after early struggles, so we really have no weak link on D. Meanwhile the Rags have had like 4 weak links on D. Sadly this will probably be the last year we’re this deep on the blue line with the impending FAs

Don't remind me. Sad we can't keep everyone together forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...