Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schefter: McNabb to Skins; compensation unknown

UNCrules2187

By UNCrules2187,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

ED-209 Newbie

ED-209

Posted
Posted

Why are you all bitching at the eagles giving him up for so cheap? The Panthers gave up Peppers for absolutely nothing. McNabb will help a team like the Redskins, he wont save them, still he is easily worth a 2nd.

why are you comparing 2 totally different situations?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Sooo let the Campbell to Carolina rumors begin!

Bad idea. Campbell hardly qualifies as the kind of solid, low-risk vet they need in a backup.

Eagles must be ready to trade up the draft for a QB.

They have Kolb and like him. Why would they do that?

I would like to see Campbell here.

See above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
outlaw4 Veteran

outlaw4

Posted
Posted

Great move by the eagles... The skins basically sold their 2nd and 3rd round pick for a one year rental. It is almost a guaranteed lockout after this season and while the eagles are reloaded with talent the skins are oft with a 35 year old washed up qb who cost them two good picks
Assuming a lockout, the one who took the bigger risk is the Eagles. Even if McNabb is only a short-term solution, that's all the Redskins really need anyway since they are in a win-now mode (well, more like stuck there for years with their FA moves with nothing to show for it).

The Eagles are less likely to find a Day 1 starter with that 2nd round pick and that future pick is useless if there are no games to be played.

As for talk about bringing Campbell here, I don't want another QB that needs rebuilding like Carr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

One thing for certain: Andy Reid has pushed every single one of his chips to the center of the table. He's all in, and Kevin Kolb is arguably the biggest gamble he's ever taken.

In truth, Reid's gamble is infinitely bigger than the one Fox is taking. McNabb certainly has his flaws, but he's done well in the WCO and was coming off a good season. Sure there were fans who wanted him gone, but I seriously doubt they were the majority. In relief, Kolb has looked decent, but not "world beater" good.

By contrast, Jake Delhomme had followed up an awful playoff game with an equally awful season. In came Matt Moore, who played well enough to win early on and got better with each start. Yes, he's still something of an unknown, but going with him over Delhomme was nowhere near the "holy crap" move as trading McNabb (to a division rival, mind you).

As a side note, I always pick the wrong day to not keep up on football news :nonod:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCMunnerlyn1 Mentor

SCMunnerlyn1

Posted
Posted

ok so my friend is in here with me .. one of the biggest mcnabb supporters ive ever met .. he just sh*t a golden chicken .. like no eggs involved just cock a doodle splat .. The Eagles plain and simple have successfully pissed off a good portion of the upper united states while the rest of us down here just begin a slow clap ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted

why are you comparing 2 totally different situations?

Two star players for two organizations, both slightly past or passing their prime age, both of them playing their entire careers with one team. The difference being the positions they play and the eagles actually received compensation.

Unfortunately if you look close enough this situation has more similarities than differences. I understand the circumstances for both teams are different (not going to go into the tagging/Delhomme nonsense) but the fact remains that as of now each organization is now without said player, but the Eagles got picks for their declining star. I personally think BOTH teams got a deal. McNabb is an above average QB but the next few years will most likley be his decline, I don't think he is another Favre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Samuel L. Jackson Newbie

Samuel L. Jackson

Posted
Posted

It's not like they haven't been talking about it on ESPN for over a week. It was just a matter of working out a trade.

Yeah, but when I suggested it was Washington, exactly a week ago, it was met with someone basically laughing and saying "no way"...

Nobody has really been saying Washington was in the mix either...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • rebelrouser
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...