Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bulger or Campbell


bLACKpANTHER

Who should we sign as out backup QB??  

94 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should we sign as out backup QB??

    • Campbell
      38
    • Bulger
      34
    • Other
      23


Recommended Posts

Campbell is still starter quality, will push Moore for the start position but it will probably cost us a draft pick (probably 4th or 5th)..

Bulger is older and is past his prime. He could mentor Moore more but wont push him for the spot. He will be had cheap since he was released.

Other...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think a miss on this choice would have drastic long term effects on the team... and since I've been pretty impressed with Moore, I would say Bulger for his experience and the help he would give Moore. Campbell would be purely competition for Moore and wouldn't bring much else other than a backup role. Bulger would be a decent backup and a mentor for Moore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tough call...

only reason I go with Campbell is because he can make sure moore doesnt think that everything is all of a sudden his so to say. and if moore flops, we have campbell. and like said above, we have one of the best O-lines in the NFL. (ONLY if we could get him for a this years 6th and next years 6th or 5th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

F__k Campbell and f__k Bulger...Keep 'em both. Bring in someone unknown/unproven to test Moore. That is how we got Matt, no? that is how we got Jake, no? Sleepers are harder to find, but I will leave that in more capable hands...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say Bulger because we need a backup QB with enough talent and experience to start if the starter gets injured. He's good enough to push Moore to be better but not good enough to take his job. Campbell is not a bad choice either, but that would likely be an open competition. That and we need all the draft picks we can get this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither. I would've prefer Bulger if Panthers are force to pick one like they got a gun to their head. He wouldn't cost us some draft picks like Campbell would required. Like I said before, I doubt Campbell want to play where he won't be the starter after Fox clearly said Moore is the starter. If we don't get a QB in the Draft, I can see McCown & Cantwell as backups. Campbell isn't coming here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These are the three deep throw attempts that Will Levis made in week 12. His first one is a beauty; Levis and Westbrook-Ikhine gets the safety to bite on a deep dig only to go over the top for the score. His second throw is another beauty: a crosser to Calvin Ridley reminiscent of Bryce to XL (though Ridley has noticeably more separation on his route). His third and final deep shot was an incompletion from his own endzone on 3rd & 14 with pressure coming down on him (to me, this seems like a solid throw).   Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-02.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Levis took half of the deep shots that Young did. The differences are: Ridley had much better separation than XL, which is why his deep crosser turned into a 63yd play since he was able to scamper for another 15+ after the catch. Westbrook-Ikhine holds on to his TD pass. Bryce had to throw one away to preserve time for a field goal. Bryce had two more throws that were incomplete due to the WR Are we really holding the three WR errors and clock management decision against Bryce in order to say that Will was better throwing deep in week 12? That's not passing the eye test nor is it confirmed by the data.
    • If you go on the PUP list before the season starts, you are gone for the year. If you start the year on the PUP list then you can get off of it. Kind of semantics, but we are putting him on the PUP list now which is before week 1, that’s why people who come off of it aren’t really on the PUP list until week 1, hence you usually hear right before the season that they are “starting the year” on the PUP list. I think PUP list and IR may basically be the serve the same purpose now because you also sometimes hear that if a player is added to the IR before week 1 that they aren’t eligible to come off the IR list for the entire year. Now, everyone added to IR (post week 1) can come off after 4 (or more) games so the PUP list is meaningless since it’s 6 games and starts at week 1. Anyone added to PUP or IR in the preseason is gone for the year.
×
×
  • Create New...