Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Xavier Legette struggling


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Matthias said:

I rather our younger guys struggle now and be good later, versus being studs in camp and duds on the field.

That's fair. Not to compare them because Legette won't be at his level, but DJ Moore was not exceptional at anything in his first camp or preseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Joe Bear said:

That's fair. Not to compare them because Legette won't be at his level, but DJ Moore was not exceptional at anything in his first camp or preseason.

Yeah... DJ Moore was better after the catch than before. Plus he was a fumbler early on as well. Sometimes players just take time to develop into their final form. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coleman has one of the best QB's in the league the last several years throwing him the ball on an a team with an established and experienced playoff staff.

The Panthers are coming off their worst season in decades.

The talk surrounding Legette is getting silly. At least let him showcase something in preseason and go from there.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Coleman has one of the best QB's in the league the last several years throwing him the ball on an a team with an established and experienced playoff staff.

The Panthers are coming off their worst season in decades.

The talk surrounding Legette is getting silly. At least let him showcase something in preseason and go from there.

he is not the precise route runner as others, he is the big strong DK metcalf type and they have said as much.  Whether that is what Young needs remains to be seen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To me edge is the biggest need and i like the Mykel Williams pick.  If we go QB, I like Cam Ward at 6 but maybe not 2.
    • I mean it's one game and the guys need to build chemistry, I'm not taking too much from it. The Aves and Oilers are both 0-2 heck the Oilers have been outscored 2 to 11. The Predators are also 0-2 (need chemistry)   I know we won't be as good as the last few seasons but I highly doubt we miss the playoffs.     
    • Surprise. Another mini manifesto from me.    Nice! So the league relies on behavior not becoming an NFL coach or athlete… where they will issue at will fines (and possible suspension) determined  by staff and former (I’m sure completely impartial) players, in an arbitrary amount with a number that makes no damn sense.   Which then goes to fund their various philanthropies… who will then disperse with the funds pretty much however they damn will please. Good stuff. Kind of sounds similar money laundering, but I’m sure that never happens. I bet they would COMPLETELY welcome a year in which no fines were handed out so nothing got funded… or maybe I’m being unduly cynical.  A longitudinal study on what teams get fined the most year to year and who the former player(s) on the committee were those years… could be… interesting. So the current methodology is horribly flawed and visibly ripe for corruption. The money should go to 1, uno, specific community outreach organization that has absolutely nothing to do with the NFL. Keep NFL fingers off of it. After hours tutoring in math and science in poor inner city communities. Something everyone agrees on, or something of similar ilk.  Either way it’s poor form to rely on money gained from an action you say you don’t want to fund your philanthropy, that is financially dependent on such behavior occurring. It’s similar to Chantix not being on the Medicaid formulary… but of course they want everyone to stop smoking. Tobacco taxes, what?  Bias exists in every individual, so no method is completely impartial, however, if ‘correction’ of these bad behaviors is the true goal, just do away with money and go to straight suspensions. X gets you 1 quarter. Y gets you a half. Z gets you a game and so on. 
×
×
  • Create New...