Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers vs Pats 7pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

If I’m guessing, maybe they wanted to see him against the Pats backups and 3rd stringers?? Plus Luton was signed a few days ago. Probably still learning the playbook. 

He aint ever playing in the nfl without correcting his throwing motion.  It takes entirely too long for him to throw the ball.  I suspect his long arms make this impossible

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

To see if they make the team or get replaced/cut when teams start trimming down their roster.  A lot of the guys last night didn't play much last year or weren't on the roster.  He seems to be concerned about out depth and rightfully so. Here is how he answered it.  The bad news is (maybe it's just coach speak) he is talking about going over the film with Plummer like we are keeping him around...

Q: Dave, obviously, not playing your starters was a conscious decision. How do you evaluate the game as a whole knowing you kind of went in shorthanded that way?

DC: Oh, I think just valuable reps, right? For these guys, the opportunity to play this many snaps in a preseason game for the guys that were up for this game, it's invaluable. Jack Plummer getting out there; he had a rough night but it was just such – it's his first NFL game, and hopefully, we'll get to the point where we can show him the film and just kind of show him, 'Hey man, trust your preparation, trust your timing from practice,' and just to stay composed as the game goes along. He was able to put a good drive together, but then we had the grounding penalty that kind of kicked us out of that advantageous field position that we had. So, I just love the opportunity it gives for a lot of the guys for us to evaluate them.

 

His demeanor is going to be really interesting if we are sitting at 2-9 or whatever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He aint ever playing in the nfl without correcting his throwing motion.  It takes entirely too long for him to throw the ball.  I suspect his long arms make this impossible

Nothing that I saw last night shows otherwise.  Also he was incredible slow with his progressions.  I felt like it took him a good 2 seconds to throw at it wide open check down one play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Nothing that I saw last night shows otherwise.  Also he was incredible slow with his progressions.  I felt like it took him a good 2 seconds to throw at it wide open check down one play. 

I think I said on here last night its a suped up version of Kerry Collins.   Just slow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

His demeanor is going to be really interesting if we are sitting at 2-9 or whatever

Yeah it's hard to keep the positive energy when the losses are piling up.  Hopefully we get some wins early and the players start feeding off his energy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah it's hard to keep the positive energy when the losses are piling up.  Hopefully we get some wins early and the players start feeding off his energy.  

The first 10ish games are pretty winnable with the exception of Cincy and maybe atl, if we are not sitting at or around 4 wins or so then something has gone wrong and the back half of the schedule is brutal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

The first 10ish games are pretty winnable with the exception of Cincy and maybe atl, if we are not sitting at or around 4 wins or so then something has gone wrong and the back half of the schedule is brutal

We just lost 17-3 against the other worst team in the league although it was preseason......none of our games look winnable right now....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is not much you can say.  However, to those who are critical about not playing the starters, not saying that I disagree with you, but here are some possible reasons.

1. Injury--maybe not this game, but at the end of a 12-game season in college, and I did not play much more than anyone else, you run down.  We had something like 10 ice tubs, and they were rarely filled early in the season.  By the end of the season, you had to show up early and schedule a time.   The 100 man roster was down to about 75 players for the final game--college is not as violent as the pros and they play 20 games excluding the playoffs.  I do not know how they do it.

2. Building the roster from the bottom up.  Remember, we have first choice on the waiver wire.  We need to know what our bottom 40 players look like.  Building depth is very important because injuries are going to happen. Coaches need to watch film to identify and prioritize our weaknesses.  We also need to pay attention to players on other rosters who are likely to be waived in a few weeks.  Zappe, for example, is likely to be waived by New England--we have film on him. If we can find a "gamer" on the roster, it could help.  I know guys who were weak or average in practice but in games, they were incredible.  One became an all-pro for the Eagles, and my first impression was "how did he get a scholarship?"  Got my answer.

3.  The weather.  In the rain, groins are much more likely to be pulled.  People tend to slide and lose their balance/centers of gravity.  When that happens you lose your technique, and that leads to injury.

4. Morale.  If the starting OL has not played together, it would be demoralizing to see them struggle against a second unit.  Canales is a cerebral, emotional coach who feeds on positivity.  Maybe he felt putting them in position to fail (based on their lack of time to gel in practice) would not be beneficial.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I think I said on here last night its a suped up version of Kerry Collins.   Just slow

Suped up?  Maybe he's wish.com Kerry Collins.  Come on man.  Kerry wasn't nearly that bad.  Especially after he quit being an alcoholic and played for the Giants.

In the early 2000's era, a pocket statue was completely viable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe I just read somewhere that the Rams don't do Top 30 Visits. I mean, it makes sense from the standpoint of trying to keep information close to the vest.
    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
×
×
  • Create New...