Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is the benefit to benching starters for the preseason?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Plus Bryce played in the preseason his rookie year.  Cross everyone off his list but Stroud, AR, and Levis.

That entire group saw more action last year than Bryce.  It was talked about a lot at the time. 

that entire group will have seen action this preseason.  

I think it's safe to say, our staff has been doing a horrible job getting a team ready to play.  Preseason (an d not the just the games).....likely part of that botched puzzle.  Because no matter the angle, we/Bryce stand out. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I started noticing a trend when I was tabulating and thought, "surely not."

Whelp....

Looking at the win/loss records shows just how mediocre this team has been over its history. It's gone from mediocre to just bad since the last SB, especially after Tepper bought it.

And before anyone says it, no, those 7 winning seasons don't make up for all the losing seasons because those handful of highs don't make up for the lows, especially since those highs always ended with another loss.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Looking at the win/loss records shows just how mediocre this team has been over its history. It's gone from mediocre to just bad since the last SB, especially after Tepper bought it.

And before anyone says it, no, those 7 winning seasons don't make up for all the losing seasons because those handful of highs don't make up for the lows, especially since those highs always ended with another loss.

Yep. A win in 2003 or 2015 woukd have forgiven a lot but alas, here we are.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Basbear said:

I was thinking the other day, fox with that 2015 team should have been enough to win. 

But here we are in 2024 with the main plan is fox ball. 

Fox chased those 2 pt conversions in SB 38. Had he not I think they needed the winning FG to tie. I seem to recall Pats made a 2 pt conversion but they wouldn’t have tried it if we had just stuck to the 6pts plus 1 pt standard.

He did a great job getting us there, and that loss hurt bad. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

image.gif.6432460000300a213fc5b07a9aed399d.gif

What did I say that was wrong? I’m not moving any goal posts. You were using veteran QBs who’ve played for the same coaches and then pointed to Herbert with a new coach and you didn’t realize he was hurt all preseason until Monday. Personally, I’ve never said that I think sitting vet QBs is a problem.

I just gave you a list of Young’s closest peers and showed that Young was the only one not taking snaps and he has a brand new coach and a brand new OL.

Sorry you couldn’t argue against valid points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Plus Bryce played in the preseason his rookie year.  Cross everyone off his list but Stroud, AR, and Levis.

Same thing got discussed last year. Young barely saw action while the others got a lot more reps. We talked about it in here that we didn’t get why Young wasn’t getting more reps when it looked like he needed them.

Suffice it to say that Young is an outlier when looking at the preseason time of the last two draft classes which contain 9 1st round QBs and Levis. Seems like that’s a substantial set of examples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

IMO, 2015 was more so. The Broncos were so clearly the worst team we had played all postseason. 

Then Rivera and Co. decided to fug the pooch as hard as possible.

That is true about Denver.

I was cringing all was it two weeks or one, but I was cringing because our side was acting way over confident to me. I saw it coming. 

Talk afterwards... but when you win, no words needed. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, strato said:

That is true about Denver.

I was cringing all was it two weeks or one, but I was cringing because our side was acting way over confident to me. I saw it coming. 

Talk afterwards... but when you win, no words needed. 

Yep. The warning signs were there. 

And even having a HOF QB didn't matter. He was the worst stsrting QB in the NFL that season and played terrible.

It was our game to lose and we fuging lost.

That's one I will never forgive Ron & Co. for. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

IMO, 2015 was more so. The Broncos were so clearly the worst team we had played all postseason. 

Then Rivera and Co. decided to fug the pooch as hard as possible.

The 2015 team was the best in the NFL that year.  They should have won.

The 2003 team should have never been there in the first place.  So many of the regular season and playoff games were like Disney movie finishes.  It felt like it was gonna happen, and then it just... didn't.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...