Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers acquire cornerback Michael Jackson in trade with Seahawks


Carolina Panthers
 Share

Recommended Posts

Seahawks still dealing. Bears stacking up on edge guys. They already drafted Austin Booker in the 5th who has been looking good in preseason. On paper Poles has this Bears roster set up nicely. Not sure what Seattle gets out of a 6th unless this guy was a definite cut. Would've been an upgrade at situational pass rush for us

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Martin said:

I’m going to counter this one as I think we have 4 starters in round 2-5, which is very very good. Not sure how much more you can ask from a draft than that And maybe Legette pans out as well, that would make it a fantastic draft.

Trevin Wallace has looked really really good, and I don’t get the comment about  Sanders struggling to block? I know it was in his draft profile, but the last preseason game I watched he did a very good job. 
 

So I would say it looks like a really good, potentially great draft to me so far.

 

 

13 hours ago, ECHornet said:

Yall are wild. Judging rookies and we haven’t played our first game yet. On top of that, we’ve heard and seen positive things from our mid to late round picks. 

 

8 hours ago, NAS said:

Are some people seriously criticizing Morgan for trading a 7th rounder to fill a key gap in our roster?  I know we’re not in win now mode but it had ti be addressed. This was a really good trade for us

 

3 hours ago, Panthering said:

What's funny is I wouldn't be surprised if we look back on this draft class as one of the best in recent memory for the Panthers. We're both coming to these conclusions/thoughts before they've played a single down of regular season football though 😂

 

 

Is this not the worst roster in all the land??

 

Yes, well it has the most room AND need for talent. While its farrrr too early, the draft picks are looking like 3 out of 7 will not be helping this piss-poor roster the first 6 weeks. It is too early and nit picking, but if a rookie is cut or traded before the first snap you can for sure break the rule of judgement.

Morgan had 7 picks to add starting talent and the best he's done is you need to wait until 2025. That's the issue. In order to have a good draft you need 2 legit starters, 1 top backup, and 1 depth. The 2025 draft could leap over this "2024 but wait til 2025" one. 

Im in a pissing mode that he wasn't able to find a couple of talented starters for the team that most needs them. Maybe the draft wasn't the best group, he still had 4 picks in the 101 including 2 in the first 39. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually feel the opposite about our draft class this year. It looks like all four of our first  picks will contribute to the team. That's WAAAAAY better than what we've done in almost ten years 

Edited by SOJA
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...