Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

Beamer smoking that crack rock post game.  Sellers isn’t the best player in the country.  He was the NFL version of The Golden Calf of Bristol out there today.  I mean props to his running.  Clemson couldn’t put him on the ground.   But that’s not good QB play.  Just a tank that is lined up at QB. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

If anything S.C. beat themselves with bad fumbles on the move. S.C. dominated the 4th.

SC also got 2 big questionable calls that took Clemson out while threatening to put up points in big moments. 

I mean, it wasn’t like it was a bad snap turnover where yall shot yourselves in the foot.  Clemson made plays there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

SC also got 2 pretty questionable calls that took Clemson out while threatening to put up points in big moments. 

I mean, it wasn’t like it was a bad snap turnover where yall shot yourselves in the foot.  Clemson made plays there. 

 

I mean that was a fumble, not even questionable. Cade pitched it back and the running back didn't control it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jaxel said:

I mean that was a fumble, not even questionable. Cade pitched it back and the running back didn't control it.

He controlled it enough to attempt to complete the play and lateral the WR while down.  Call on the field was down.  

Catch before the half.   No clue how you reverse that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

He controlled it enough to attempt to complete the play and lateral the WR while down.  Call on the field was down.  

Catch before the half.   No clue how you reverse that. 

Well the review determined other wise, and the play was call down because of Cades knee not the running back. The RB was fumbling around that ball till he hit the ground, thus it popped up so easily.

Edited by Jaxel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every couple years SC manages to find a way to narrowly beat Clemson.  That was a good game to watch.  You could feel that outcome coming though at the end early on.  

Came down to QBs late.  Sellers one man showed it.  Cade crumbled and panicked.    Ready for the end of the Cade era.  Hope that was the end of it.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

Every couple years SC manages to find a way to narrowly beat Clemson.  That was a good game to watch.  You could feel that outcome coming though at the end early on.  

Came down to QBs late.  Sellers one man showed it.  Cade crumbled and panicked.    Ready for the end of the Cade era.  Hope that was the end of it.  

There's a lot of negative QB recruiting ammo for opposing coaches after DJU and Cade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was real disappointed in SC's secondary or very impressed with Klubnik and their WRs-  however that goes - because Clemson was eating. And not allowing SC to do anything on the ground except Sellers breaking out. Until late. 

I watched a few 4th quarters this year and Sellers is a badass. His passing will be fine with some more time, I think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...