Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

I dunno it rewards poor timeout management

Unless it's the whole game. Still totally changes 2 minute drills in favor of whoever has the ball last. I still haven't payed attention enough to it, but it seems like it totally takes away defensive strategy to close out a game, yet the offense can kneel it out if they have the lead 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I'm talking about his son.

 

You said he's got nothing around him yet he's set up for great stats. That doesn't make a lick of sense.

 

I'm not talking about Prime.

Dad doesn’t want to be able to run the ball.  Dad doesn’t care he makes the OL look bad.  The entire mission is his son and his production.  And when he is done with his son all that will be left is a bunch of Sanders bullshit as they all leave. 

North Dakota State getting this shot at the end to win and are 4 yards short of winning because Sanders is a bad game day coach.  They shouldn’t have had the opportunity.  They got it because like always….Sanders wanted his son to have some knockout throw and prioritize his son

is the QB Sanders a talent? Sure. But Colorado is a reality TV show.  Dad isn’t a good coach and they are going to be bad again because the goal and plan is the QB 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We are literally running a QB-less offense right now. Runs and screens. That's it.

We've benched our QB without benching our QB.

Welcome to the life of a Clemson fan.   Minus the great the D and run game. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m all for bringing a QB in but who? The FA list is ass. The draft class isn’t great I’d take a flier on Trey Lance and if available in 4th someone like Leavitt or Mateer? I never wanted Dalton back especially at the contract Dan gave him. He’s utterly useless on the field and his cap hit isn’t nothing. He provides nothing.  There’s a lot of bad QB play this year and passing is down. Guys worth trading for are most likely not going to get traded.  As much as many of you don’t want to hear it our best option is to decline the 5th year option. Give Bryce 2026 while we have him under contract. Then in 2027 either sign Bryce (tag would be an option. Don’t repeat the Darnold mistake) or draft another QB and do it all again
    • The league did Jerry Richardson dirty. But Jerry Richardson played himself. He went out of his way at every opportunity to be as subservient to the shield as humanly possible even when the league went out of it's way to make it abundantly crystal clear that they did not want to see Cam Newton be the face of the league to the point they had the refs do their bidding. If Jerry had any backbone he would have taken the gloves off with the league after SB50. But he just took it on the chin.
    • You need to sign of draft a legitimate starter. As long as the o line is intact they can support a rookie. Even a raw one like Sellers. 
×
×
  • Create New...