Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He's an above average college QB, but he is not a pro QB.  He has a noodle arm and it was on full display in this game.  I thought Syracuse would play Pitt pretty close but boy was I wrong.

I was under the impression he had good arm strength just struggled reading defenses at OSU.  Good to know.  Yeah he is a undrafted QB at this point if he even signs anywhere...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I was under the impression he had good arm strength just struggled reading defenses at OSU.  Good to know.  Yeah he is a undrafted QB at this point if he even signs anywhere...

His passes looked pretty slow to me last night.  He was just throwing it at guys regardless of if they were open or not.  He doesn't have the velocity or the accuracy to beat that kind of coverage.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

College GameDay discussing the possibility Colorado making the playoffs if they win out. They have them favored in every game.

 

From worst HC in college football to a possible playoff teams the following season. I love when a plan comes together.

 

Sko Buffs!

2 losses with that schedule is pretty bad. Do they have any signature wins? I’m assuming they would play someone like Iowa St for the Big 12 championship…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

2 losses with that schedule is pretty bad. Do they have any signature wins? I’m assuming they would play someone like Iowa St for the Big 12 championship…

 

37 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

No, they don't have a signature win.

This is sad. Coming into the season the narrative was Colorado wouldn't win more than 2 games. 

 

Now that they winning you're now saying the schedule sucks.

 

Y'all make it so obvious. Just give the man credit as a HC. It's not going to kill you to say something positive about coach Prime.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

 

This is sad. Coming into the season the narrative was Colorado wouldn't win more than 2 games. 

 

Now that they winning you're now saying the schedule sucks.

 

Y'all make it so obvious. Just give the man credit as a HC. It's not going to kill you to say something positive about coach Prime.

 

 

I’ve never been a Colorado hater? You seem to have a it’s us against the world kind of attitude about them. I’m just saying I don’t see them in the playoffs unless they beat a tough team in the Big 12 championship game. They do that and they are in. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

College GameDay discussing the possibility Colorado making the playoffs if they win out. They have them favored in every game.

 

From worst HC in college football to a possible playoff teams the following season. I love when a plan comes together.

 

Sko Buffs!

How many top 25 teams would have to lose their remaining games for this to happen? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...