Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 11/27/2024 at 5:42 PM, Pazhoosier89 said:

Boise State, Penn State, SMU, Notre Dame, Tennessee and Miami shouldn't get in by your standard. None of those have any big wins and ND has a terrible loss against NIU. Let's just put all these crappy 3 loss SEC teams in.

So Florida doesn't count as a big win?

Last I checked they're the bestest team in the country and have a superstar QB. Or does that only count when they beat middling SEC teams like LSU and Ole Miss?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jaxel said:

"Better Talent" is that Clemson bias showing. South Carolina this year, especially on the defensive side of the ball is possible the best in the nation.

We’ll agree to disagree.  Maybe change my wording to better roster would have been more accurate. Gamecocks have some nice defensive players….but they are also thinner than Clemson all around.  

it’s at Clemson.  Dabo.  Better overall roster.  And they are favored slightly….which essentially supports my prior post that either could win but if you had to pick without a dog in the race Clemson is the smarter pick.  

straight up vs Carolina? I trust Clemson’s O more than Carolina’s.    Top 10 vs top 60 with the QB edge.  And Clemson’s D has some real studs on it too.  

Which is what Vegas says.  

I’ll make my pick game day.  Will depend on who can and can’t suit up for Clemson.  Carolina has been much healthier this year. 

But ST could be the difference.  That Louisville game exposed some massive flaws in their kick game.  You don’t really want ST weakness showing itself vs Beamer.  And the 1 Gamecock win of the last decade….ST was the decider IMO.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Travis Hunter sealed his Heisman trophy today. Sucks they didn't show up last week. Playoffs would have been more exciting with Colorado in the playoffs.

 

*As I was writing this Hunter just made another crazy TD catch for his 3rd TD lol

Yeah I was thinking either Hunter or the Boise St RB, but Hunter should have it now. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hunter and Jeanty have the strongest Heisman resumes I just don't know if they'll give it to a non-playoff team player. They might need Miami to choke down the stretch.

Hunter was the best player in college football. Jeanty wins it any other year, but when you have a guy who a finalist on offense and defense it's pretty much a no brainer to give it to the guy who is elite on both sides of the ball.

 

Also I'm shocked Hunter made it a full season playing both sides. Kid is unreal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hunter and Jeanty have the strongest Heisman resumes I just don't know if they'll give it to a non-playoff team player. They might need Miami to choke down the stretch.

Yeah, I think you got to go Jeanty.  He will finish the year off carrying his team to the CFP with one of the greatest rushing seasons of all time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Things will look good for S. Car if they beat Clemson tomorrow 😄

Decent odds Clemson is down 3 starters on the OL tomorrow. It’s a wrap for Clemson if that’s the case.   SC could get style points on top of a good win

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...