Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

Beamer smoking that crack rock post game.  Sellers isn’t the best player in the country.  He was the NFL version of The Golden Calf of Bristol out there today.  I mean props to his running.  Clemson couldn’t put him on the ground.   But that’s not good QB play.  Just a tank that is lined up at QB. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

If anything S.C. beat themselves with bad fumbles on the move. S.C. dominated the 4th.

SC also got 2 big questionable calls that took Clemson out while threatening to put up points in big moments. 

I mean, it wasn’t like it was a bad snap turnover where yall shot yourselves in the foot.  Clemson made plays there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

SC also got 2 pretty questionable calls that took Clemson out while threatening to put up points in big moments. 

I mean, it wasn’t like it was a bad snap turnover where yall shot yourselves in the foot.  Clemson made plays there. 

 

I mean that was a fumble, not even questionable. Cade pitched it back and the running back didn't control it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jaxel said:

I mean that was a fumble, not even questionable. Cade pitched it back and the running back didn't control it.

He controlled it enough to attempt to complete the play and lateral the WR while down.  Call on the field was down.  

Catch before the half.   No clue how you reverse that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

He controlled it enough to attempt to complete the play and lateral the WR while down.  Call on the field was down.  

Catch before the half.   No clue how you reverse that. 

Well the review determined other wise, and the play was call down because of Cades knee not the running back. The RB was fumbling around that ball till he hit the ground, thus it popped up so easily.

Edited by Jaxel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every couple years SC manages to find a way to narrowly beat Clemson.  That was a good game to watch.  You could feel that outcome coming though at the end early on.  

Came down to QBs late.  Sellers one man showed it.  Cade crumbled and panicked.    Ready for the end of the Cade era.  Hope that was the end of it.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

Every couple years SC manages to find a way to narrowly beat Clemson.  That was a good game to watch.  You could feel that outcome coming though at the end early on.  

Came down to QBs late.  Sellers one man showed it.  Cade crumbled and panicked.    Ready for the end of the Cade era.  Hope that was the end of it.  

There's a lot of negative QB recruiting ammo for opposing coaches after DJU and Cade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was real disappointed in SC's secondary or very impressed with Klubnik and their WRs-  however that goes - because Clemson was eating. And not allowing SC to do anything on the ground except Sellers breaking out. Until late. 

I watched a few 4th quarters this year and Sellers is a badass. His passing will be fine with some more time, I think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...