Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

A shame the brand is keeping Bama in. Any objective person watching college football can see that South Carolina is a better football team than Bama, who has played bad the last 6 weeks.

I think they are the same tier teams.  I think most of the top 25 really is.  I’d probably let head to head settle the differences.  That OU loss would make me think long and hard though.  With no dog in that fight, I could understand it either way 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mack Brown is starting to cry about how he was fired claiming he was going to retire all along but the school wanted it to be announced before the State game and he wanted to wait until after. Surely he doesn't think anyone believes that line of pure bullshit. The man had just been publicly talking about his plans to return next year. Seems pretty obvious they were trying to get him to retire and he refused then tried to pull a power move and talk about returning thinking they wouldn't be willing to fire him and he was wrong about that. Now he wants to play this victim bullshit. fug off Mack. That doesn't make a damn bit of sense that they'd fire you kete days before you were going to retire.

I read this comment from Bubba:

We've had some inconsistencies," Cunningham said. "We had a lot of ambiguity about what our future looked like, and we needed clarity. This year in particular, we were up and down. We had all the things – the James Madison postgame thing — and i was really hopeful that he and I could agree what the future would be and when we would make that decision and go forward. But ultimately, we couldn't."

Cunningham said the pair have been having conversations about future and about "clarity" since the James Madison game.

The administration offered Brown, the winningest coach in program history, the chance to retire, sources said. Brown said during a press conference Monday that his intention was to coach the Tar Heels in 2025.

"I said that we're going to have a different coach next year, and we couldn't agree about how," Cunningham said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, for Mack to pretend like he got the rug jerked out from under him mere days before he was planning to announce his retirement really soils his legacy IMO. It's a lie and it's not even a believable lie. You'd literally been saying in the days leading up to it that you planned to return next year and why would they fire you if you were planning to retire? It just doesn't add up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

I think they are the same tier teams.  I think most of the top 25 really is.  I’d probably let head to head settle the differences.  That OU loss would make me think long and hard though.  With no dog in that fight, I could understand it either way 

Head to head is a poor argument given the trajectory of both teams. If you eliminate FSU last year because they lost their QB. 

 

Why not reward the team who's Freshman QB has caught fire since early in the season when that game was played. 

 

Also adding to the fact SC should only have 2 losses as they were robbed in that LSU game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

Head to head is a poor argument given the trajectory of both teams. If you eliminate FSU last year because they lost their QB. 

Why not reward the team who's Freshman QB has caught fire since early in the season when that game was played. 

Also adding to the fact SC should only have 2 losses as they were robbed in that LSU game. 

well, every fanbase can argue if it wasn’t for the refs they would have won a game they lost.   But aside from that, I’m good either way.   SC or Bama.   I think that will be far down the list of complaints when the dust settles.  

frankly I’m rooting for chaos so the CFP has to really show their hands and set precedence year 1 of the 12 team format.   Or outrage is generated so they fix the format/criteria    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

well, every fanbase can argue if it wasn’t for the refs they would have won a game they lost.   But aside from that, I’m good either way.   SC or Bama.   I think that will be far down the list of complaints when the dust settles.  

frankly I’m rooting for chaos so the CFP has to really show their hands and set precedence year 1 of the 12 team format.   

 

Typically one can. But it was argued at a NATIONAL level that they got screwed and my biggest complaint about Beamer is his aw shucks attitude about everything. He should have gone piss and vinegar about it and ate that fine given he makes several mil per year. 

 

He had another opportunity in his post game presser and didn't take it. If he gets left out he will have only himself to blame. 

Edited by SCMunnerlyn1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

Typically one can. But it was argued at a NATIONAL level that they got screwed and my biggest complaint about Beamer is his aw shucks attitude about everything. He should have gone piss and vinegar about it and ate that fine given he makes several mil per year. 

 

He had another opportunity in his post game presser and didn't take it. If he gets left out he will have only himself to blame. 

What I really wish happened in football in both college and pro….is after a game is over and the league/conference/refs “explain” what happened on a call…..that explanation was public info.   Because you know sometimes the response is….well, we got that one wrong. 

I’d love to hear the explanation on the Mafah fumble.   Clemson runs a play to the SC 20.  They then blow the whistle after that play to go back to review the play before that.    And they give SC the ball despite the fact that play was blown dead before SC “recovered” the ball.   I mean you don’t even have to get into the was he down with possession argument/fumble/lateral part.   No point arguing that component.  How do you rewind the clock like that after a full play is off AND then how do you award possession for what happened after a play was blown dead.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/1/2024 at 2:24 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

Mack Brown is starting to cry about how he was fired claiming he was going to retire all along but the school wanted it to be announced before the State game and he wanted to wait until after. Surely he doesn't think anyone believes that line of pure bullshit. The man had just been publicly talking about his plans to return next year. Seems pretty obvious they were trying to get him to retire and he refused then tried to pull a power move and talk about returning thinking they wouldn't be willing to fire him and he was wrong about that. Now he wants to play this victim bullshit. fug off Mack. That doesn't make a damn bit of sense that they'd fire you kete days before you were going to retire.

egotistical boomer the worst of humanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why Travis Hunter shouldn't win the Heisman? Because even Colorado isn't willing to actually sell that narrative. 

Colorado just sent their marketing to all Heisman voters for who should win....

it's HeisMEN.  Plural.  With Shueder listed first. 

Give my boy Jeanty the award. His numbers blow the last 2 Heisman RBs out of the water. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

why Travis Hunter shouldn't win the Heisman? Because even Colorado isn't willing to actually sell that narrative. 

Colorado just sent their marketing to all Heisman voters for who should win....

it's HeisMEN.  Plural.  With Shueder listed first. 

Give my boy Jeanty the award. His numbers blow the last 2 Heisman RBs out of the water. 

And when Travis doesn’t win….you can credit Deion for not helping in the end.  Deion controls all.  So that marketing pitch to all the Heisman voters was all Deion Sanders message.    And he prioritized his son….because that’s always been why he was in college football.  It’s family business. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Damn the Tankers are already out here talking bout tanking?  
    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
×
×
  • Create New...