Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

ACC Champions 8 of the last 10 years!  Clemson can’t help the CFP playoff is what it is and that they will be in….with a host of other teams that also don’t belong.

Tough to win games when you got no run game.   A hurt Phil Mafah on the field the last 2 games is just painful to watch.   It’s like watching a FB with heavy ankle weights on run.   And it put way too much on the shoulders of Clemson’s QB.  

Dabo tried to do the Lord’s work and knock Bama out.  The work should be done.   But you never know what the devil got cooked up.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Bama Panther said:

My rankings, not that they mean anything:

  1. Oregon
  2. Georgia
  3. Arizona State
  4. Boise State
  5. Penn State
  6. Notre Dame
  7. Texas
  8. Ohio State
  9. Tennessee
  10. Clemson
  11. Indiana
  12. SMU

First Two Out: Bama, Ole Miss

All but 1 ESPN analyst has SMU in over Bama.  Interesting.  I guess their showing last night was deemed impressive enough.  We will see

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shocker said:

All but 1 ESPN analyst has SMU in over Bama.  Interesting.  I guess their showing last night was deemed impressive enough.  We will see

I wanted SMU to win before the game started. Once Clemson jumped out, I wanted them to throttle SMU, as I think a throttling would have allowed the committee to sneak Bama back in. Then, as SMU mounted their comeback, I wanted them to pull it out. 

The new system hasn’t changed anything, other than the amount of teams in the field. The arguments that folks used to have about the #4 seed are now just had at the #11/12 seeds (depending on where the fifth conference champ is ranked). 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bama Panther said:

I wanted SMU to win before the game started. Once Clemson jumped out, I wanted them to throttle SMU, as I think a throttling would have allowed the committee to sneak Bama back in. Then, as SMU mounted their comeback, I wanted them to pull it out. 

The new system hasn’t changed anything, other than the amount of teams in the field. The arguments that folks used to have about the #4 seed are now just had at the #11/12 seeds (depending on where the fifth conference champ is ranked). 

Hell, the same arguments are used for bubble teams in a 64 team field in the basketball tournament. There are always going to be teams barely in and barely out and folks squabbling over them.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Bama Panther said:

My rankings, not that they mean anything:

  1. Oregon
  2. Georgia
  3. Arizona State
  4. Boise State
  5. Penn State
  6. Notre Dame
  7. Texas
  8. Ohio State
  9. Tennessee
  10. Clemson
  11. Indiana
  12. SMU

First Two Out: Bama, Ole Miss

SMU vs Texas

Indiana vs Notre Dame 

I think they find a way to rank them to get that outcome.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...