Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales is one and done, btw


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Go smoke a bowl and chill, Canales will be here next year.

idk man, Tepper is "mr overreact and make even worse emotional decisions." more games like this and Tepper will blow it all up again. will become an annual or biannual routine for this team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

We just hired a coach no one else even interviewed. We’re there. We are late stage Al Davis raiders. 

And it sure doesn’t look like Canales was vital to the bucs success. 

We also hired Scott Fitterer’s right hand man….who no one wanted 

and he added no QB talent to the roster for when the obvious was going to repeat itself 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthering said:

Canales is not one and done btw

3 of Tepper’s HC coaches have been one and done.  Back to back with the soccer club. 

if today just repeats itself?  I wouldn’t bet against Tepper doing what he does 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

3 of Tepper’s HC coaches have been one and done.  Back to back with the soccer club. 

if today just repeats itself?  I wouldn’t bet against Tepper doing what he does 

Ya know, as much as I don't think it's going to happen I cannot push back on the logic. Proof is in the pudding in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HPPantherzfan said:

Maybe not but to me it’s hard to tell, we have a QB that looks like a$$.  You can’t evaluate anyone on offense with him behind center

We saw that early on, along with the fact that our scheme didn't fit our personnel (and nobody seemed to care).

He wasn't ready to be an OC, but having a QB with issues certainly didn't help.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...