Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So it’s between us and the Giants for #1 pick?

LegioX

By LegioX,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

If we get the #1 pick please just trade back and collect assets like the Bears did.

 

This team has way too many holes and a QB is not solving all of our issues.

 

We can get a stop gap QB in FA or via trade.

The Bears traded back for another #1 pick. I doubt we get that lucky lol

Depends on the situation. A decent QB would fix a lot of BS on the offensive side and there is a good line here now so far. Not sure this crew could do much more with it given the state of coaching throughout. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Mage said:

Giants have a lot more talent than us.  They won 6 games last year between Jones, Taylor, and DeVito.  They probably won't win that many again, but I can see them winning 3.  Does anyone think the Panthers are winning more than 1?

This.

 giants simply have enough talent to win 5-7 games with poor QB play......I doubt panthers could win with good QB with the defense I seen this past sunday..

I predicted 2 wins and now thinking  thats too high.

Still it was just one game, bad as it was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

The Bears traded back for another #1 pick. I doubt we get that lucky lol

Depends on the situation. A decent QB would fix a lot of BS on the offensive side and there is a good line here now so far. Not sure this crew could do much more with it given the state of coaching throughout. 

Yeah that probably won't happen but another future 1st would be huge. I'm assuming it will at least be top 10 considering a team would be trading up for a rookie QB.

 

We have to start thinking about getting the most talent we can on this roster. Adding a rookie QB to a bad roster just doesn't seem like the right move. I get people are ready to move on from Bryce, but this QB class isn't really that great either. Putting a Beck or Ward/Ewers with this roster just doesn't excite me.

Maybe we could trade back for a Hunter and a possible player from a team. It doesn't have to be a future 1st necessarily. Just get some talent on this roster is all I hope for.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Yeah that probably won't happen but another future 1st would be huge. I'm assuming it will at least be top 10 considering a team would be trading up for a rookie QB.

 

We have to start thinking about getting the most talent we can on this roster. Adding a rookie QB to a bad roster just doesn't seem like the right move. I get people are ready to move on from Bryce, but this QB class isn't really that great either. Putting a Beck or Ward/Ewers with this roster just doesn't excite me.

Maybe we could trade back for a Hunter and a possible player from a team. It doesn't have to be a future 1st necessarily. Just get some talent on this roster is all I hope for.

If they get 2 1st, a player of Moore's ability on that kind of contract and more picks look hard at the offer. Most teams don't offer that and bow out. A very poorly run team did. I don't see another team other than us that would do that deal today. It didn't happen with Chicago this year.

It's hard to tell at this point. I don't think the best QB is always the guy the media wants to go first. If I trusted the crew making the call more then I would be fine with a lot of things depending on the situation but this crew is going to be a tough sell for me given everything going down this year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • toldozer
      The Big Dance

      By toldozer · Posted

      Penn is hanging with Illinois. They've got to rebound better off all these threes Illinois is jacking up. If they do better on the boards in the second half they'll have a chance late.
    • toldozer
      College Basketball 2025

      By toldozer · Posted

      Duke will beat TCU but I can't see them beating kansas or st John's 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Trade: Panthers are trading veteran QB Andy Dalton to the Philadelphia Eagles in exchange for a 2027 seventh-round pick, per sources.

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      Dalton is ancient by NFL standards. Howell is only 25.  Howell's only year as a starter he put up almost 4k yards, 21/21 with a 43.2 QBR while being sacked 65 times.  This past year and the 3rd starting, which many would consider to be Bryce's best, he barely put up 3k yards 23/11 with a QBR of 47.6 while being sacked 27 times.  Pickett 4 years in the league, with 27 starts, he's amassed 4900 yards, 16/16 with a 53.6 QBR.  Now if Bryce were injured for a season, which QB would you say has more potential to step in and run an offense? I'd say Howell only because in a single season he threw for 1k yards less, more tds and granted more ints in 11 less games as a starter than Pickett's whole career.  Everyone is saying Pickett sucks, Howell sucks, but what I'm seeing is Bryce is right on par with them. Howell is on his 5th team, so is KP, yet Bryce just got a 5th year extension putting up pretty much similar numbers. The bar for QB on this organization is really low.  Did I want Howell? I didn't care. I wanted someone, anyone, who can potentially be better than what we've had the past 3 years or who we signed as a backup. We do not have even a mid tier NFL QB on the roster right now.  If Howell was brought in as camp fodder and didn't make the cut, wouldn't hurt my feelings at all. If we bring in another QB via the draft, I hope it's someone who could have the potential to be a starting QB with some development because that's the whole point.  We can't be afraid to bring in anyone who might have the potential to unseat Bryce or take his job if he's injured. The goal is to get winning seasons and make SB runs with hopefully a victory or 2. Pickett doesn't accomplish that. Dalton hasn't been able to even be in consideration for that role in over 2 years. 
×
×
  • Create New...