Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Games Week 3


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

The Bengals might have a civil war brewing. When you have one unit playing this trash it's going to cause a LOT of locker room tension.

If we cap off their slide at 0-4 them losing to their previous franchise qb Andy Dalton who plays for the worst team in the league?? Whew Boi. Thats basically a nuclear bomb dropped on Cincinnati 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hoenheim said:

Jayden Daniels is that dude!! Holy fug!!!!!

Bengals can definitely be beaten. But they're gonna be 0-3 and out for blood coming to Carolina.  Not gonna be easy for sure.  Be we've learned that they are beatable...

Pretty sure we already knew that.... seeing as they were 0-2 with a loss to the enimic Patriots..   

 

They are 0-3 for a reasonm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Tell that to the people in this thread claiming we will lose to Cincy. They suck and they are winless for a reason.

 

 

I swear at this point most of these people love misery.... they also can't seem to disassociate the Bryce disaster from the fact that those of us watching the details saw the rest of the offense was producing week 1 and 2 the midget just couldn't get anyone the ball. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We very well might. Their D is trash but that offense is still potent.

As atrocious as we've been for years I'm nit about to get cocky after we finally win one.

How is the offense potent when you trashed their Oline earlier?

 

People still buying the Bengals contenders bandwagon. They have been bad for 2 straight years. Its time to move on from the hype.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...