Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremy Fowler: Panthers aren’t eager to trade Diontae Johnson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

Why cant we resign him?

First, he might want to sign here and second, why would he resign now instead of in FA when he can get offers from everyone. He’s done well enough already.

Also, for someone who mentioned the franchise tag. It’s something like $30M from what I remember reading in a thread about this before. It’s high enough that he’d be happy to play for it and then be an UFA in 2025. We can’t pay him that much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WhoKnows said:

First, he might want to sign here and second, why would he resign now instead of in FA when he can get offers from everyone. He’s done well enough already.

Also, for someone who mentioned the franchise tag. It’s something like $30M from what I remember reading in a thread about this before. It’s high enough that he’d be happy to play for it and then be an UFA in 2025. We can’t pay him that much. 

what else is he supposed to say when asked?  And he did leave the caveat of saying its out of his hands.  Without us overpaying, which we are prone to do, there is no way he stays here all things considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The selling points of the Panthers would be generally, an offensive mindset from the coach. 

A chance to work as the number one and enjoy the focus and the ego stroke of being lead dog. 

And possibly a dollar or two difference in being paid like a number one over a sidekick elsewhere.

That's about all I got right now. 

Things I don't know are how he likes the city, the coaching staff and his teammates, and how he views the near future of the team. Maybe he believes winning is not that far away, maybe he doesn't. 

edit: as far as money, how many of you would be happy with 19 million per vs 20? Some people don't put the absolute value of getting an extra nickel when you are talking about getting more money than you ever imagined possible growing up. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

what else is he supposed to say when asked?  And he did leave the caveat of saying its out of his hands.  Without us overpaying, which we are prone to do, there is no way he stays here all things considered.

I’m not optimistic. He’s going to want to get paid. I’m not sure we’ll match it and the allure of playing for a playoff team and getting some big recognition is not something we can offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, rayzor said:

and we don't need to be eager about trading him. if someone asks and they give us the moon, sure. if not...just roll with him. 

I think we need to see his contract demand and interest now. It shouldn’t be hard to see if we’re close. We completely fuged up with Burns. We should have had him extended in 2022 and known exactly what he wanted and how far away we were before we turned down the Rams. We were stupid and didn’t manage it right and got caught in a we don’t want to pay Burns what he wants and now we have to trade him.

We don’t have to be eager but let’s know the scenario well enough so we don’t turn down an ok trade while waiting for the moon and ending up with nothing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, csx said:

I'm not eager to trade him either but reality suggests it needs to be considered.

Especially if starting Bryce Young again is true. What is the point of having him? 

Young can be incomplete or just not target Legette all day long, as he did in the last game he played. Same difference if the guy won't pull the trigger, can't see where he is throwing, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, NAS said:

Anything less than a 1st rounder isn’t worth it 

I doubt anyone is going to give us a first for a guy who is on a one year contract.  But if they do and we don't take it and we don't resign him, then the entire front office should be fired.  

I will add that if we get offered a second and don't take it, then we have to sign him long term.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I doubt anyone is going to give us a first for a guy who is on a one year contract.  But if they do and we don't take it and we don't resign him, then the entire front office should be fired.  

I will add that if we get offered a second and don't take it, then we have to sign him long term.  

If someone offers even a 2nd you take it and never look back. No way in hell they are getting a 1st for him. It's going to be a 4th at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

If someone offers even a 2nd you take it and never look back. No way in hell they are getting a 1st for him. It's going to be a 4th at best.

Someone earlier said that if we can't resign him and he walks, we get a comp pick.  If true (and I am not sure how that works), then we should keep him around till the end of the year if anyone offers only a 4th.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...