Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game thread


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

I could see how he's effective in the locker room but guys also like playing for him.  I thought Borrego was thrown out a little too soon, especially just for Clifford to return, but I bet the locker room is so much happier playing for this kinda guy. Time will tell if he can actually nail rotations and in game scenarios with the game on the line but at the least he seems genuine and sensitive to his players 

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking good so far. What I love to see is they have a lot of fight in them. Guys are playing hard for each other and their new head coach. LaMelo is definitely stepping up. Even Nick Richard's showed some grit out there. Tre Mann has been a great addition. It's very nice to have a local team worth watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, frankw said:

Looking good so far. What I love to see is they have a lot of fight in them. Guys are playing hard for each other and their new head coach. LaMelo is definitely stepping up. Even Nick Richard's showed some grit out there. Tre Mann has been a great addition. It's very nice to have a local team worth watching.

Having new owners with a vision also makes a huge difference. Just read this article and compare the quotes and plans these guys have to Tepper and it’s obvious why one franchise is trending up and the other one keeps finding new lows. 

https://www.newsobserver.com/sports/article294019699.html

Edited by BIGH2001
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hear you and I have said the same thing at times, but blanket statements are accurate part of the time at best.  I have also coached kids who had the "tools" but they were slow and unproductive on the field--and a few adjustments to the scheme or teaching techniques, and the light comes on.  We call them "late bloomers."  Based on my limited experience, it should be called "coaching."  As a former coach, if you gave me kids with the tools and I could not get them to perform at the level of their ability, then I have failed.  The coaches know this, so their timetables to win may be shorter than the time they have to develop a player--I think a lot of talent goes down the disposal, which is why the success rate for drafted players is so low. In my view, based on my career as a professor and researcher, my job is to produce successful people for the workplace.   I use data to identify central problems and I use my relationships with my students to strengthen weaknesses.  I have a limited amount of time to do this before a decision is made about their development.  In this case, I would look at the variables (data and the situational influences unique to this individual that may have stunted growth) and not the ineffective player as the center of the problem.  The team has already interviewed him, talked to his college coaches, measured him, etc. So I would minimize the assumption that the kid is the problem and look at his system of support and teaching strategies.  Nobody wants to admit THEY might be the problem.  To blame a first-rounder for failing, you have to admit either you did not properly identify the prospect's potential (which is your job) or you were unable to prepare that prospect (with all the tools that got him the job) to succeed (also your job).  So are we going to blame the 24-year-old kid with all the tools to succeed for sucking or are we going to take responsibility for his success as his mentors and teachers?  
    • i was hoping they might bring robinson back but he went to the darkside.  They will need to sign a free agent as Evero does not like to start rookies.
    • Flexibility. If they don’t work out we simply walk away. If they look great we have the first crack at extending them. 
×
×
  • Create New...