Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales still not sold on Bryce?


Jackson113.2
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, CRA said:

you don't get to play the 27th and 29th worst run Ds most weeks in the NFL. 

this week Bryce will go back to looking like a middle schooler.  KC is 3rd vs the run.   Which means it will be a couple hours of check downs and sacks. 

The Titans had the #1 rushing attack a few years ago and got the #1 seed and then they were promptly smoked in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

Look, after your Dan Morgan thread I’m pretty sure you’re 12. Hailing 126 yards as anything other than abysmal is nothing shy of being ridiculous.

Save the insults for someone else. At the very least, get better at them.

Young's best-case scenario is a middling game manager (game managers, if you didn't know, don't put up Mahomes numbers) and when the run game is working well, Young doesn't need to do much to win. I prefer winning to sexy passing numbers in losses, but maybe you feel differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, CRA said:

you don't get to play the 27th and 29th worst run Ds most weeks in the NFL. 

this week Bryce will go back to looking like a middle schooler.  KC is 3rd vs the run.   Which means it will be a couple hours of check downs and sacks. 

Yeah, I'd probably bet on it. My point was if you're moving the ball on the ground, it's retarded to whine about there not being a ton of passing yardage. It's bitching just to bitch. Young will give people plenty of fodder for that on merit; making it up because he didn't throw for 20 yards (when Hubbard ran for 20) is stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Joe Bear said:

Save the insults for someone else. At the very least, get better at them.

Young's best-case scenario is a middling game manager (game managers, if you didn't know, don't put up Mahomes numbers) and when the run game is working well, Young doesn't need to do much to win. I prefer winning to sexy passing numbers in losses, but maybe you feel differently.

I could do better, those that know, know.

You’re just not worth the effort. a crybaby reactionary thread to the Johnson trade and then hounding every poster personally that disagreed with you said everything. You’re just childish, nothing more needs to be said.

Ps. How many yards does Johnson have with the Ravens again? 6 yards through two games?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Joe Bear said:

Yeah, I'd probably bet on it. My point was if you're moving the ball on the ground, it's retarded to whine about there not being a ton of passing yardage. It's bitching just to bitch. Young will give people plenty of fodder for that on merit; making it up because he didn't throw for 20 yards (when Hubbard ran for 20) is stupid.

well, it's not like we witnesses some freakshow rushing outing though like we have in our history. 

We had a total of 306 total yards.  You really need to get a lot more from the pass game off a rushing day like that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Icege said:

What was the yardage that Bryce was supposed to throw for when the team is up 10-0 at the half thanks to Chuba's 93 rushing yards?

Genuinely curious as to why people think that a team winning on the ground needs to abandon the run.

I don't think they needed to abandon the run.  We essentially have to try to win in spite of our QB.  Who isn't a NFL starting QB.   I don't think this game represents Bryce being good or showing growth.  We played a bad team, minimized him and it worked out.  That's basically our shot at winning games. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I don't think they needed to abandon the run.  We essentially have to try to win in spite of our QB.  Who isn't a NFL starting QB.   I don't think this game represents Bryce being good or showing growth.  We played a bad team, minimized him and it worked out

That's one way to look at it, but the common complaint has been that he threw for only 126yds in a win. With that being the case, what was the stat line that people wanted to see from a game where the run was doing work?

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Icege said:

That's one way to look at it, but the common complaint has been that he threw for only 126yds in a win. With that being the case, what was the stat line that people wanted to see from a game where the run was doing work?

well, Bryce not losing games for us and not asked to be a big part of the O.....is how we should be trying to win.  

so it depends what convo you want to have.  How the Panthers should try to win games without a starting caliber QB or do you want to have a Bryce Young convo.  To me, that are different convo and you talk about the game much differently. 

If Bryce/Canales were both average at their jobs.....well, Bryce has a much better stat line in a game like that.  I mean, go look what NFL QBs in the top 5-15 do when the run game is really working well.  You generally end up w/ a strong offensive day.  Which we didn't have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

well, Bryce not losing games for us and not asked to be a big part of the O.....is how we should be trying to win.  

so it depends what convo you want to have.  How the Panthers should try to win games without a starting caliber QB or do you want to have a Bryce Young convo.  To me, that are different convo and you talk about the game much differently. 

If Bryce/Canales were both average at their jobs.....well, Bryce has a much better stat line in a game like that.  I mean, go look what NFL QBs in the top 5-15 do when the run game is really working well.  You generally end up w/ a strong offensive day.  Which we didn't have. 

The convo that I am trying to have is that in a game where the opponent could not stop the run what is the appropriate passing yardage for the QB?

I've seen plenty of folks denigrate the stat line and understand that nothing in this universe will ever get them to be okay with Bryce because of his physical attributes, but I'm not interested in changing minds. I just want to know what the threshold for passing yardage was for a QB who's run game was dominating. If the number is too low then what would make it right?

Otherwise, we are drawing subjective conclusions (ie: winning in spite of Bryce) rather than objective ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Icege said:

The convo that I am trying to have is that in a game where the opponent could not stop the run what is the appropriate passing yardage for the QB?

I've seen plenty of folks denigrate the stat line and understand that nothing in this universe will ever get them to be okay with Bryce because of his physical attributes, but I'm not interested in changing minds. I just want to know what the threshold for passing yardage was for a QB who's run game was dominating. If the number is too low then what would make it right?

Otherwise, we are drawing subjective conclusions (ie: winning in spite of Bryce) rather than objective ones.

This isn't about one game this is about the entire body of work. His limitations as a passer in a passing league are plainly evident.

Bryce Young barely has more passing yards in 23 games than undrafted Kyle Allen did in 13 games.

You are no more objective on this matter than anyone else. Just as you were with Teddy Bridgewater. You spent most of camp trying to run off anyone critical of Bryce. Give the holier than thou a rest already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we're being a little harsh with the judgment towards Bryce right now. He is definitely showing growth. Just wish he could have shown this level of confidence last season. But to be fair, the oline and weapons were horrible for a rookie QB. So from here on out we should be able to see if the real Bryce Young can be an NFL franchise QB. 

Also can't forget he's playing with 3 rookies as his primary targets. The 7th WR taken off the board, a 4th round TE, and an UDFA WR. On paper, that's not a great scenario, particularly for a 2nd year QB. 

Take away a couple of drops and a silly illegal formation, and Bryce would have around 175 yards and 2 TDs Sunday. Here are some other passing numbers against the Giants this season:

Burrows - 208 yds

Hurts - 114 yds

Daniels - 209 yards and 226 yards

Darnold - 208 yards

Watson - 196 yards

Dak - 221 yards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

I think we're being a little harsh with the judgment towards Bryce right now. He is definitely showing growth. Just wish he could have shown this level of confidence last season. But to be fair, the oline and weapons were horrible for a rookie QB. So from here on out we should be able to see if the real Bryce Young can be an NFL franchise QB. 

Also can't forget he's playing with 3 rookies as his primary targets. The 7th WR taken off the board, a 4th round TE, and an UDFA WR. On paper, that's not a great scenario, particularly for a 2nd year QB. 

Take away a couple of drops and a silly illegal formation, and Bryce would have around 175 yards and 2 TDs Sunday. Here are some other passing numbers against the Giants this season:

Burrows - 208 yds

Hurts - 114 yds

Daniels - 209 yards and 226 yards

Darnold - 208 yards

Watson - 196 yards

Dak - 221 yards

A)again growth is relative to where he was.  He was basically the worst starting qb in the history of the modern nfl last year and through 2 games this season.  Has he improved from that?  Yeah sure but he is still the worst qb in the nfl right now

 

B) for fugs sake please stop playing the what if game.  The ebbs and flows are penalites and dropped passes are part of it, you dont get credit for that.  And if you do you need to factor in the poo throws he gets away with

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You want Josh McDaniels to be our Head Coach so all your narratives need to end 
    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...