Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers vs Eagles official thread


Jackson113.2
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

If the INT wasn’t thrown eagles probably don’t score. At the very least, panthers punt with not much time left. I watched the game, that’s why I said when the eagles scored off the turnover that was the game. If we are gonna blame XL blame others mistakes too. Take those bs box score comments back to your momma. 

Nice rebuttal. Complete bs but you do you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

If Bryce didnt sail that INT panthers would have won. 

I agree with your previous post but I'm not sure about this.  That assumes that the team would have scored that drive.  We can much more safely assume that the team would have scored had XL not dropped that ball.  So while the turnover was part of the losing equation, I don't think it tracks as closely as a dropped TD pass to go up late in the 4th.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

If Bryce didnt sail that INT panthers would have won. 

remind me how much time was left in the game when the INT occurred?

did the Panthers, you know, regain the lead at any point? 

was XL's drop in the first or second half?

just trying to jog my memory of the game so I can figure out what happened, you know, since I distinctly remember having a lead in the 3rd quarter and having a WR drop a TD with less than a minute left... But hey maybe I'm mistaken and Bryce threw a pick to end the game.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Lobo said:

a game losing INT

this... man.. okay, so I didn't read the whole post initially but this is just such an idiotic take.

The Panthers are not a good team. But you know, every team has QBs that throw INTs. The Eagles have won 3 of the 4 games Hurts has thrown an INT in. The Bucs have won 4 (including vs us the previous week). The Chiefs have won 7.  I'm picking these teams because they are our last three opponents, and somehow they manage to win despite a turnover. Or sometimes many turnovers.

When an INT is thrown at the end of the game, yes, it loses the game. When a fumble happens at the end of the game, yes, it loses the game. And when a drop happens at the end of the game - yes, it loses the game.

You had a very reasoned Bryce take and then blame him for the loss, which is ridiculous.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, csx said:

Young completed 55% of his passes for 190 yds sith a 69 passer rating while throwing and interception that lead to 7  when we lost by 6 and he is  getting praised. 

Interesting 

 

3 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

mac and bone literally just said he is playing like the best qb in the league.  Goddamn dont ever change fnz

I wanted to respond to you two above but dam the two responses below say it All.

3 hours ago, Billy Goat said:

Let's be fair here. If Legette didn't have stone hands it would've been 220 yards, 2 TDs and 1 Int and we'd have been winning with 45 seconds left. More than respectable for a road game against the Eagles who have the best overall defense and only allowing 180 yards passing per game.

 

3 hours ago, rayzor said:

context doesn't matter when you've got your narrative to run with. 

I’ve realized context Doesn’t matter Bryce better start throwing those dimes and then run out there and catch it his dam self and maybe just maybe they’ll tip their cap to him nothing less. If I wasn’t watching Bryce navigate the pocket throw dimes with DE/DTs all in his face pulling him down from behind or shake men who blow past their Olinemen while still staying composed eyes down field and delivering down field consistently and then have his Wr drop passes cut off routes or not play strong enough to catch the ball through contact I’d understand but dam Bryce looks like he’s back at Bama he’s doing his part to help us win clear as day!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/9/2024 at 11:14 AM, PNW_PantherMan said:

I agree with your previous post but I'm not sure about this.  That assumes that the team would have scored that drive.  We can much more safely assume that the team would have scored had XL not dropped that ball.  So while the turnover was part of the losing equation, I don't think it tracks as closely as a dropped TD pass to go up late in the 4th.

Ranking hypotheticals on a probability curve now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, electro's horse said:

Ranking hypotheticals on a probability curve now?

It isn't hypothetical to say XL scores if he doesn't drop the ball because he dropped it as he rolls untouched into the endzone. It is hypothetical to say we would have scored if not for the INT as that'd be several plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You joke, but it can always be worse. He might walk with a limp or need assistance. Different sport, but Lonzo Ball couldn't even walk up steps a year after his injury.
    • I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there: There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders. The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young. Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November. Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall. The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them. So if we're framing things with that context: Chuba was expected to be RB1 Miles (at the time) was RB2 Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway. The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).   NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.
    • Yep, but they can all rotate with Brown, Brown and Robinson (sounds like a law firm). Can't continue to have Derrick Brown out there for 90+ percent of the defensive snaps. An injury was bound to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...