Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I know most of y'all want defense but currently at pick 4...


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think the front office has shown they want to surround bryce with the tools to succeed by trading away defensive(and offensive) pieces to put him in the best position to win. Your currently sitting at pick 4 with a real chance of the top 2 picks being QB and new England logically could go LT or Hunter coin flip.

If you are on the clock at 4 with a chance to grab a an elite peice for bryce, because let's face it he still doesn't have that. None of our current offensive options are number 1 options on any team. If you want to maximize Bryce I don't see how you go defense at this spot unless the pick is Hunter.

With hunter I think he is the only viable pick that can improve both sides of the ball in some fashion. No not  a full time starter on both but, you would be a fool to not sprinkle him in on which ever side that is not his main position.  I see the love for Graham and I like him but a run stopping defensive tackle in the top 4?  Unlikely.. the value just isn't there. He's a great player and if I'm picking between 6-10 he's in the cards.  

We have seen if you want Jamar Chase, Nabers those type talents they go high... That's what Bryce needs to take the next step. I do love Abdul Carter if hunter goes Number 3 to New England.. but at pick 4 I think those are the only 2 options right now. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hunter or Tmac for me.

 

Hunter and Horn DB tandem would be great and we still have Brown in the middle at DT. That's a solid foundation to start building this defense. Also Hunter is a playmaker if he gets a INT he's looking to score. He's gonna put points on he board for the defense.

 

Tmac he's quite simply the only real true #1 WR in this draft. If you can give Bryce that kind of weapon it takes the offense to another level.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CBDellinger said:

Just go BPA with stop 5 pick.  

I don't think that term really exists. Everything is weighted.. Say Sanders is on the board and is the boa you not going to take him.. or that tackle who is currently top 5.. you not going to take him. Everything is weighted to some degree to fill a gap.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

I don't think that term really exists. Everything is weighted.. Say Sanders is on the board and is the boa you not going to take him.. or that tackle who is currently top 5.. you not going to take him. Everything is weighted to some degree to fill a gap.

Engrish?  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Hunter or Tmac for me.

 

Hunter and Horn DB tandem would be great and we still have Brown in the middle at DT. That's a solid foundation to start building this defense. Also Hunter is a playmaker if he gets a INT he's looking to score. He's gonna put points on he board for the defense.

 

Tmac he's quite simply the only real true #1 WR in this draft. If you can give Bryce that kind of weapon it takes the offense to another level.

That's it, if neither are there, trade down. I love Mason but not at 4, trade down to 8 and get an extra 4th rounder. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

I don't think that term really exists. Everything is weighted.. Say Sanders is on the board and is the boa you not going to take him.. or that tackle who is currently top 5.. you not going to take him. Everything is weighted to some degree to fill a gap.

I'd take the tackle in a heartbeat if he grades that high

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Panthero said:

That's it, if neither are there, trade down. I love Mason but not at 4, trade down to 8 and get an extra 4th rounder. 

That trade down nets us at minimum and extra round 2 pick 4 spots in the first round hold a lot of value but yea I def like the thought of a trade down two 2nd round picks with Graham.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully free agency will set up round 1 for BPA. So depending how we go in free agency will dictate which direction we draft, but you have to get a DUDE in round 1. If we can get Hunter, he has to be used on both sides of the ball. So that can be designed plays on offense if he is our #1 CB and vice versa. There is only one true #1 WR And that can go a long way for Young going forward. 
 

Either way you look at it we have to get a DUDE in round 1.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, csx said:

I'd take the tackle in a heartbeat if he grades that high

I mean how... Where does he play? You benching icky.. benching moton?  Offensive line is a strength right now. Best since 2008.. if you take a tackle at 4 it doesn't make us much better at all.

Edited by micnificent28
  • Pie 4
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Panthero said:

That's it, if neither are there, trade down. I love Mason but not at 4, trade down to 8 and get an extra 4th rounder. 

Let’s not get cute with this draft pick. Can you sit there right now and believe in our front office to get this right? as it stands now, if we hold the number four pick then we should just get who we want to get or whoever is the best available in that position.
 

Time and time again we have seen our team fail in the draft with getting it right. I like what we have done so far, but I still don’t have the confidence in them with this trade down proposal. They will find a way to screw it up.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yep so its essentially working against us
    • Solid point about the rookie contract especially since I believe Tepper and company brought that up, he was so good we could sign other players while he is on a rookie deal and capitalize on the cap space. Sorta like Seattle did with Russ while he was on a rookie deal. But, problem is Bryce isn’t close to that version of Russ and Tepper sucks as an owner. 
    • Look at who they’re interviewing there.  parcels, aikman, Peyton etc. the youngest guy is KOC who’s forty.  The passing game 25, 35, 45 years ago looked less glamorous to be sure but it was far more complex. You didn’t have these packages where you’d make quick checks, every play was its own thing, basically everyone was playing under center etc. once the nfl got out of the dead ball era things became very complex very quickly and they hadnt figured out a way to truncate it. Plus it was nowhere in college or high school. Vertical passing attacks just didn’t exist.  So yeah parcells probably does have that view because that’s what he came up in. Aikman had to learn that when he got to the nfl. Aikman was so lost his rookie season the cowboys almost took Jeff George first overall in 1990.  Today the learning curve is a lot lower. pro concepts today borrow a great deal from the college game now. Tons of air raid stuff, RPO, pistol, etc. even though everything is faster at every position, it’s schematically more simple. The learning curve is nowhere near what it was for even Peyton manning when he came out.  plus, prospects today are basically pro qbs from the time they’re in middle school. Bryce Young for example lived in invite only qb camps since he reached his max height at 12 years old. The whole “they shouldn’t get paid because they get a degree for free” was always just an insincere argument from racist old people, but no one even pretends to make it anymore. Playing qb at a division 1 school is a full time job for years before you even get to campus.  And that is all they do. The days of people excelling in multiple sports to the point there’s pro interest and then just choosing one or the other and succeeding are over. Aikman was drafted by the Mets out of high school and decided to go start as a freshman at Oklahoma.  The exact opposite is happening now, to the point you’ve got guys going to play baseball for a few years, coming back to college football, and playing until they’re like 27.  that’s actually one of the theories about why darnold isn’t better than everyone feels he should be. He only played two years of college football. In highschool he was first team all everything in every sport. Dude has an insane athletic pedigree. But there’s at least four years of highschool invite camps he never got to go to. You can’t just be the most athletic guy in the room anymore.  So obviously the older guys are complaining about how things are done; it’s what offer guys do. But the pro game today is much more accessible for these guys than it was back in their day, and the players are more ready for the transition. Like is anyone defending Anthony Richardson? What im saying is we know what Bryce young is and we should t wait for waiting’s sake. 
×
×
  • Create New...