Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just a reminder...


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We gave up on this:

Screenshot_20241229-192608.thumb.png.6fb9961945ffef01fff9a0e442ee8df3.png

who did this to us today

Screenshot_20241229-192557.thumb.png.6a072f16244df66d95ba07c7e93536c3.png

and this

Screenshot_20241229-192531.thumb.png.01079587e99f88e4d4b7f7e7e210673d.png

who did this to the Packers today

Screenshot_20241229-192520.thumb.png.358692e4a5423cbdf63c55268d06e99a.png

to trade two 1sts, two 2nds, and DJ Moore for this

Screenshot_20241229-192625.thumb.png.d08d61966215a342f373e78e5a3ac02d.png

And now you're constantly trying to get rid of that while he's 23 and showing regular improvement sooo... you're making the exact opposite of the point you think you are, by quoting their best statistical seasons that came years later.  It could easily be interpreted to say surrounding cast, scheme, and development time are needed and that qbs can actually improve over time.

Edited by Tr3ach
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

You can make the argument for sure, but no one was questioning the talent level of the other two even while they were here. 

Yes they were that’s why they were traded or released.  You’re obsessed with size and arm strength, that’s not the problem with this offense. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

I just find it utterly hilarious just how badly this place trashed Darnold and Mayfield while they were here and now we keep finding excuses to blame their success somewhere else on everything else except us. 

Exactly, remember how cooked Baker looked, I think he broke the record for number of passes batted down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Hes got next year.  Everyone agrees on that.  Would you give him the 5th year option at the rate of his current play?

That's the thing, there is no reason to make that decision now because they don't have to consider 5th year option right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, NAS said:

And there was a reason we gave up on the first two, who played a lot worse in a Panthers uniform so who’s to say if you give up on Bryce he won’t win an MVP somewhere else lol. 

There's a part of me that wished we traded Bryce just to see this place's reaction to him playing like he is now with someone else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

But they do next year.  What are the expectations for him to get the option?   

Continue to improve in every category and win more games. Be the reason we win those gamed.  Hard to quantify exactly because it depends on other factors like defense and receiving options. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oddly feeling really good about tonight. fug the heat
    • Here are my takeaways from the conference (IMO): - Is Dan against taking a WR 3 years in a row? No. Would that be his preference? Also, no. Not by a long shot.  - I think draft gurus are wrong. Tight end is not an early priority. They like the guys in the building enough to see them develop, but a later round guy is being looked at (just seemed like he was able to label a couple of guys "talented", but stopped short of suggesting the class is good at the top. Seemed quick to talk about the depth of the class) - If we are taking a DL, it will be in the top 2 rounds. They fall off a cliff at some point soon after. - They are targeting guys in each round. I think we are more likely to move up than down in this draft to prevent missing out on a guy. He doesn't want to give up a lot though, man loves his draft picks. - DBs are a priority. We want to come away with a safety and a nickel. Maybe even a safety that can play nickel. Thieneman sounds more and more like a real possibility, if he is there. We are taking a safety in the first 2 rounds, if I had to put money on it. - Age matters more for 1st round picks, probably (Mesidor), but not for after that (Stukes). - They have a guy or two that they want in the 1st round, but crazy things DO happen in the draft, and they may shift gears and take a different guy if someone falls that they didn't expect to be there.  - Character matters. A LOT. If a guy has character concerns of any kind, you can be pretty confident they aren't on our board. They may bring in a guy or two for a visit to gauge the validity/severity of the concern though.      
    • Yeah don't wanna see anyone get hurt.  Hopefully Chatters is sitting.
×
×
  • Create New...