Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce stats since being benched


Huffgolf30
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Huffgolf30 said:

Thoughts?

Average Throwing Yards: 206yds

Average Running Yards: 22yds

TDs: 10 throwing / 3 running

INTS: 6

QB Rating Avg: 85.3

QBR Average: 53.5

 

his comp% and efficiency is still pretty low....especially given he isn't shouldering a lot of offensive production.  Bryce flirting with that 60% line.....65+% is basically meh/average in today's NFL. 

I mean, there is clear improvement.  But the bar was basically thrown to the floor.  He still has work to reach average 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is an improvement, no doubt. Will he ever be good enough? What I have liked is his demeanor in the pocket and his willingness to be aggressive. Let’s see what him and Canales can do in the same system in year two, as I would expect both of them to improve. In the meantime we build the rest of the team.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

Last I checked he was 28th in the NFL is passing yards per game, sandwiched between Daniel Jones and Gardner Minshew, two QBs that have already lost their jobs.

You can sign a number of free agents vets on the cheap and get this kind of production.

Don't check again for an update or you find he  is like 35 or something.  Behind Gardner and Jones.....as well as Spencer Rattler, O'Connell, Maye, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

Last I checked he was 28th in the NFL is passing yards per game, sandwiched between Daniel Jones and Gardner Minshew, two QBs that have already lost their jobs.

You can sign a number of free agents vets on the cheap and get this kind of production.

I admire you willingness to completely ignore the point of the OP here, and use a stat from the whole season that is also a bit old. Well done!

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought most Huddlers on here didn't care much about his stats but just wanted him to pass the "eye-ball test." To me, his performance in the clutch is more telling, making critical 3rd and 4th down plays to keep the drive alive and in the last 5 mins of a game. This team is still too dysfunctional to get a good eval. He's trending in the right direction. 

  • Pie 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...