Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

some rando's opinion... Evero *will be* first to be fired


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TD alt said:

I'd include Xavier Woods...but you don't have to...


Woods is one of the worst culprits on this team.

 

A'Shawn and Jewell are both starters on most squads.   So we are at 4/11.   And one of them has been on IR since week 1.

 

It's a horrible defensive roster.  But Evero's scheme is hot garbage this year and he needs to be allowed the opportunity to succeed elsewhere.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jamos14 said:


Woods is one of the worst culprits on this team.

 

A'Shawn and Jewell are both starters on most squads.   So we are at 4/11.   And one of them has been on IR since week 1.

 

It's a horrible defensive roster.  But Evero's scheme is hot garbage this year and he needs to be allowed the opportunity to succeed elsewhere.

Not quite sure where he currently ranks, but you may be being too hard on him. He's probably middle of the pack. His play has fallen off, but so has the quality of his backfield mates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

Name the players on our defensive roster that would start for other NFL teams. 

I would amend that to which of the players on our roster would start for the majority of the teams in the NFL? That is definitely only Brown and Horn. 

We have a small group that would start for some teams(Jewell, Woods, Clowney, Jackson, etc). That is less about them as players as it is that there are a few other dumpster fire rosters in the NFL too.

It's largely rotational guys and PS players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I would amend that to which of the players on our roster would start for the majority of the teams in the NFL? That is definitely only Brown and Horn. 

We have a small group that would start for some teams(Jewell, Woods, Clowney, Jackson, etc). That is less about them as players as it is that there are a few other dumpster fire rosters in the NFL too.

It's largely rotational guys and PS players.

Almost every D has players at the Jewell/Woods etc level starting... Jackson and Clowney have, at times, been extremely good too imo... The problem is there's nobody other than Horn playing that ever deserves a positive comment like that on our D lol.  Our JAGs are our best players 🥴

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

He got me too not long after that, I complained about him choosing a cheaper material in one of our processes that required twice the amount of labor and pointed out he wasn't actually saving any money by doing it. I got put on an impossible project with ridiculous deadlines not long after that and got the point. 

Luckily, I found a better company after that and then eventually I was my own boss when I started doing my own thing.

I worked for a boss like that once. He was actually a pretty good guy and not a bad boss but he didn't let anyone resign. If you put in your notice he'd terminate you. It was weird but whatever. Then he got mad when someone just up and quit with no notice and we were all like "Bro, you were gonna haul off and fire him on the spot anyway like you always do so why are you mad?" I honestly don't even think it has occured to him up until then. LOL

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I would amend that to which of the players on our roster would start for the majority of the teams in the NFL? That is definitely only Brown and Horn. 

We have a small group that would start for some teams(Jewell, Woods, Clowney, Jackson, etc). That is less about them as players as it is that there are a few other dumpster fire rosters in the NFL too.

It's largely rotational guys and PS players.

Evero may be fired, and I'd be good with that, but some people (NFL types) will say that we did him dirty. The gutting of our defensive personnel---what little quality we had (that strangely I'm having a hard time remembering) was jettisoned outta here in favor of the offense. At least that was the narrative. Perhaps it wasn't that, but the refusal or inability to invest in better players because we were too busy investing in the offense. Now, I'm skeptical of both (offense and defense), and I know you don't even believe Legette will really ever be what he was drafted to be. He certainly didn't have a great season. Though I understood it, I was skeptical of the Brooks pick. I have always been a vocal supporter of Chuba, and I think that I was right. I was also skeptical of the Sanders pick, not because I think that he's bad, but because I didn't see the TE as an important part of Tampa Bay's or the Seahawks' offense, and for all that they use the TE, Tremble would've sufficed. Don't get me wrong, I believe in TEs being a normal part of the offense, but there's no need to spend high draft capital on them if you're not gonna use them to their potential. The way we run our offense, why even spend a high fourth on Sanders when we already had Tremble? I guess what I'm saying is that they didn't use the picks on offense effectively, and that has ultimately left us wanting on offense and desperately needing on defense. Their seeming method---concept---way they went about business last offseason has not beared the fruit that was the expectation. Hell, we don't even know if Bryce is the guy after all that.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Evero may be fired, and I'd be good with that, but some people (NFL types) will say that we did him dirty. The gutting of our defensive personnel---what little quality we had (that strangely I'm having a hard time remembering) was jettisoned outta here in favor of the offense. At least that was the narrative. Perhaps it wasn't that, but the refusal or inability to invest in better players because we were too busy investing in the offense. Now, I'm skeptical of both (offense and defense), and I know you don't even believe Legette will really ever be what he was drafted to be. He certainly didn't have a great season. Though I understood it, I was skeptical of the Brooks pick. I have always been a vocal supporter of Chuba, and I think that I was right. I was also skeptical of the Sanders pick, not because I think that he's bad, but because I didn't see the TE as an important part of Tampa Bay's or the Seahawks' offense, and for all that they use the TE, Tremble would've sufficed. Don't get me wrong, I believe in TEs being a normal part of the offense, but there's no need to spend high draft capital on them if you're not gonna use them to their potential. The way we run our offense, why even spend a high fourth on Sanders when we already had Tremble? I guess what I'm saying is that they didn't use the picks on offense effectively, and that has ultimately left us wanting on offense and desperately needing on defense. Their seeming method---concept---way they went about business last offseason has not beared the fruit that was the expectation. Hell, we don't even know if Bryce is the guy after all that.

Tremble is just Ian Thomas+, IMO. Classic JAG 

Sanders could be a dude. He looked the part for a chunk of the season, that is for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

Last season didn't help us much this season. They need to go younger.

I generally agree, and I'm all for it, but you can't build Rome in a day (as it seems like we've been saying the last six years now). We're going to have to have some aging vets starting within the youth movement. 

I can't help but think of Jeremy Chinn...seems like he would've been a great box safety (imagine that).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I fully expect them to pick up his 5th year , and they're waiting for him to put a full excellent consistent season of QB play in year 4 or 5. If that don't happen,  they'll eventually cut ties.  Here's to hoping he just goes on a team in 2026. The worst thing he could do is continue to see-saw us to around .500 records because it might be impossible to replace him at that point unless youre willing to do the veteran qb carousel poo we did from 2019 to 2023.   
    • What do you think of Bryce Youngs career thus far? Are you excited about his progress or is it not enough for you? I included a poll of ranking his performance through 3 years thus far.  I personally think he's made some decent progress. Has had some high moments (last half of 2024, Rams game, ATL game in 2025)  but in my mind, those are still outweighed by the many more lowlights thus far (ex turnovers, missed throws, poor decisions)  It's a very mixed bag for me. He's done enough to get a 5th year option but by no means should we lock him in with a 50+ mil a year multi year deal. I want to see him play consistently well for a full year before that happens (yes, I'm still saying that going into year 4. That might be telling).  Just sucks when you see CJ Stroud, Jayden Daniel's, Caleb Williams almost immediately lighting poo up with their arm talent. Maybe Bryce is just an ultra slow burn. I don't know what to think anymore. Guess we're gonna be stuck with him for a whilr unless we end up being bad enough to earn a high pick next year. I doubted it lol. Overall Stats for his career:       ● 14 W - 30L (regular season)       ● 0-1 playoffs record        ● 61.4% completion, 8291 passing yards, 49 TDs, 30 INTs  Year 1:       ● 2 wins, 14 losses      ● 60% completion rate, 2877 passing yards, 11 TD to 10 INTs, 5.5 yards per attempted pass Year 2:        ● 4 wins , 8 losses        ● 60.9% completion rate,  2403 passing yards, 15 TD, 9 INTs,  6.3 yards per attempted pass  Year 3:        ● 8 Wins, 8 Losses         ● 63.6% competition rate, 3011 passing yards, 23 TDs to 11 INTs  Playoffs         ● 1 game in year 3 ( 0 - 1 in playoffs)         ● 21/40 (52.5% completion rate), 264 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT. 
    • Raiders receive: 19th overall Xavier Legette Panthers receive: Maxx Crosby 3rd rounder
×
×
  • Create New...