Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

splurge on BofA Stadium renovations named 2024’s ‘Worst Economic Development Deal of the Year’


Recommended Posts

 

https://www.carolinajournal.com/charlottes-650-million-splurge-on-bofa-stadium-renovations-named-2024s-worst-economic-development-deal-of-the-year/

 

The “Worst Economic Development Deal of the Year” award, which has been given annually by the Center for Economic Accountability (CEA) since 2018, highlights state or local government subsidies for private enterprises that exemplify wasteful and ineffective economic development efforts.

Charlotte’s $650 million subsidy for the privately-owned stadium, also home MLS’s Charlotte FC, is 2024’s big winner, standing out among a competitive field of finalists, which included other sports stadium deals and corporate megaprojects across the country. The Charlotte BofA stadium renovations deal pulled away from the pack due to a combination of factors that included its high cost, lack of transparency, poor returns, questionable economic justifications and the Panthers ownership’s checkered history with subsidized projects.

Edited by Jackson113.2
Tepper sucks
  • Pie 4
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

The “Center for Economic Accountability” is literally 2 urbanist white dudes with a blog lol

Not all that wrong after looking it up. A longtime corporate PR guy and an economist with a newsletter. Awards create headlines, so it's good for their business. Always should attack the biggest industries as well, to maximize eyeballs.

But yeah, Tepper should have paid for all of it (but never will/would).

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It feels a bit disingenuous to name stadium renovations the worst development deal of the year. I mean, who else was in the category, a QuikTrip? a new McDonald's? New stadiums and renovations are in a class by themselves. They are always going to be subsidized because there's always another local government willing to court their tax dollars.

This is just how things are done in professional sports.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Joe Bear said:

Not all that wrong after looking it up. A longtime corporate PR guy and an economist with a newsletter. Awards create headlines, so it's good for their business. Always should attack the biggest industries as well, to maximize eyeballs.

But yeah, Tepper should have paid for all of it (but never will/would).

They have an axe to grind with Tepper from the business world because they attacked Rock Hill too but Nashville (1.2 Billion in public money) and Western New York (850 million in public money) deals are worse if you’re attacking stadium deals.

Edited by Panthercougar68
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the American way. We all know it, but few are willing to make sacrifices to change the way things are done. This is a glorified feudalistic system where we are the serfs. The lords are private corporate CEOs. Our elected politicians are plutocrats serving the rich, and we elect them over and over again because the proletariat is utterly stupid.

Edited by TD alt
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
    • I assumed he was retiring but apparently he plans on playing multiple more seasons.  Florida is gonna have trouble holding onto everyone.  Happens to all teams that have that much success.
    • I hate Marchand, but if he became a free agent.....
×
×
  • Create New...