Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young post benching if it were a full season worth of stats.


Car123
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Jackson113.2 said:

If 

If he was 4 inches taller he'd be MVP 

Hypothetical bull poo.

💩 

It’s not a hypothetical, it’s worse. Hypothetical is a proposition based on suppositions. If x happened, then y.

this is pure revisionism and idiocy. “If we remove 19% of the data then project what’s left to 190% of the original remaining sample we get blah

I’d make a snarky comment about confidence intervals but the OP (and whoever wrote the original tweet) clearly wouldn’t get it. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incredibly stupid to include the rush stats in with the passing stats, just separate them out and then project. Also let’s see yards per attempt. That passer rating is still bottom of the league. He’s not a good QB, people who still think he’ll be our franchise guy are blind 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

It’s not a hypothetical, it’s worse. Hypothetical is a proposition based on suppositions. If x happened, then y.

this is pure revisionism and idiocy. “If we remove 19% of the data then project what’s left to 190% of the original remaining sample we get blah

I’d make a snarky comment about confidence intervals but the OP (and whoever wrote the original tweet) clearly wouldn’t get it. 

Not sure I see the issue with only looking at the numbers after he became the starter again after his benching. He sat, learned etc. and now we want to see if something changed. Hence we will measure the new period post benching. This is common practice and used all the time. I understand you are bitter, but good grief man.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Technically it is 23 TDs to 11 INTs if you remove the rushing TDs and I think about 3500 yards which is still an improvement. 
Even the broadcasts during the 2015 season separated Cams rushing TDs to his throwing TDs. 

If you would have told me this would be his second year numbers after the disastrous rookie season I would have taken it as promising sign of development. Of course this means he’s about half a season behind on that trajectory which he will need to make up next year.  I hope he does the things this offseason to ensure a fast start next year when expectations will be higher. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, NAS said:

If you would have told me this would be his second year numbers after the disastrous rookie season I would have taken it as promising sign of development. Of course this means he’s about half a season behind on that trajectory which he will need to make up next year.  I hope he does the things this offseason to ensure a fast start next year when expectations will be higher. 

Agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Lobo said:

If they wouldn’t have benched him, he would have been traded by the deadline. No way would he have improved, that was some of the worst qb play I have ever seen. Something clicked for him when he got benched, saved his career. 

Just shows QB development is not a linear path especially when you’re on badly run organizations. Credit to Morgan and Canales for benching him. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

If they wouldn’t have benched him, he would have been traded by the deadline. No way would he have improved, that was some of the worst qb play I have ever seen. Something clicked for him when he got benched, saved his career. 

When you are threatened to be fired it can either light a fire under you or you continue continuing as normal because you see nothing you did was wrong. 
Bryce seems to have responded to the benching as the former. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NAS said:

Just shows QB development is not a linear path especially when you’re on badly run organizations. Credit to Morgan and Canales for benching him. 

Big time credit, but I still don’t think he’s the guy. Looking forward to see what happens next year if he can take the next step. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...