Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gantt,Chandler,Gosselin mocks


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Gantt mock with trades

*Round 2, pick 36: Tyson Alualu, DT, 6-3, 295,

Round 2, pick 48: Chris Cook, CB, 6-2, 212, Virginia

Round 3, pick 78: Eric Decker, WR, 6-3, 217

Round 4, pick 112: Dekoda Watson, LB, 6-2, 226

Round 5, pick 136: Clifton Geathers, DE, 6-8, 299, South Carolina

Round 6, pick 175: Arthur Moats, LB, 6-0, 246

Round 6, pick 202: Cody Grimm, SS, 5-11, 203, Virginia Tech

Round 6, pick 204: Kyle Calloway, OT, 6-7, 323, Iowa:

Round 7, pick 249: Trindon Holliday, WR-KR 5-5, 166, LSU

:

Read more: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/04/22/1390985/why-play-it-safe-now.html#ixzz0lpIuPgRL

Chandlers mock

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/04/22/1390978/its-a-deep-draft-no-need-to-trade.html

Gosselins mock(has us taking Chris Cook)

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/spt/stories/042210dnspogoosemock.3cacf47.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as you're going to punt the most successful quarterback in franchise history, and just about everyone else over the age of 30, you might as well keep the youth train rolling and make a few more bold moves to get the team back in contention.

lol Gantt is still hurt we cut his favorite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we trade up, it'll be for a WR like Demaryius Thomas or Golden Tate...

They have struck out on every drafted WR in the Fox era....if they trade future picks to move I agree w/ Gantt and it will be defense.

I don't see us trading, I like Chandler's mock of grabbing Lamarr Houston at 48.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like Gannt's draft. I do think we trade next year's one. This draft is very deep, and the value at the top of the 2nd is there.

if next years draft will be one of the more weaker ones than in the recent past, it would make more sense to trade it this year than any year before..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if next years draft will be one of the more weaker ones than in the recent past, it would make more sense to trade it this year than any year before..

Agree. The question is how much value does next year's one have.

Given all the hate that we have been getting in the media, I could see a team thinking our next year first would be a Top 10 pick. I think we will do much better than that next season and be picking in the 20's.

20's pick next year for a 30-38 pick this year (with the strength of this year's draft) is a no brainer for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With our needs at WR and on the D-line I can't see us taking a safety with our first pick as Gosselin predicts.

I also don't see us trading up in such a deep draft. Next years 1st round pick will be much more valuable next year when the talent pool is much thinner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
×
×
  • Create New...