Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs


 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Packers just don't look like they belong on the field with the Eagles. It's only 7-0 but just feels like it's a matter of time before this gets ugly if something doesn't change fast.

It really does... Feels like the only reason for a FG attempt is if they inexplicably go away from the running game lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's not about any "cult". It's about Wilson sucking and being old and Fields being younger and more athletic with a lot more potential upside. They were 4-2 with Fields starting. They were 6-5 with Russell Wilson starting.

Fair but Wilson still played better than Fields did. Hence the switch. One of them is a QB, the other isn't.

Also, Fields has zero upside. That's like saying The Golden Calf of Bristol had upside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Packers just don't look like they belong on the field with the Eagles. It's only 7-0 but just feels like it's a matter of time before this gets ugly if something doesn't change fast.

You can't count out Jordan Love. He can activate Jameis Winston mode at any point. I mean both the good and bad parts of Jameis.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Fair but Wilson still played better than Fields did. Hence the switch. One of them is a QB, the other isn't.

Also, Fields has zero upside. That's like saying The Golden Calf of Bristol had upside.

The team played better with Fields out there. Just saying. Wilson had one great game against the Bengals. Aside from that it was basically a wash.

Oh wee mayne... the Packers are cooked. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Only being down 10-0 right now with zero offensive production and two turnovers feels borderline miraculous for GB.

Like the Chargers last night they have only one legit offensive weapon Jacob's.

 

Not shocking tbh

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First off, my memory is faulty and so I should remember you. Anyways, welcome back. Having been around here since 2004/2005, I do have to say all these hot takes are not necessary new. I still very much remember all the constant complaints about Jake Delhomme. How he was too inaccurate, fumbled the ball too often, threw bad interceptions, and how Steve Smith deserved a better QB. How this franchise needed to replace Jake for someone better because he dragged everyone down. We even had names for Jake defenders; Blind Delhomme Jock Sniffers (BDJS). That one thread about Chris Weinke over Jake Delhomme because Weinke threw for 423 Yards but only scoring 13 points remains the worst hot takes I've ever seen around here. So to me, it feels like history repeating itself again and I don't feel like getting that much involved in flame wars like I used to. I am more of a sit back and see what the players/team does type of person. And even then, yes, there are so many moving parts that it's not as easy to pinpoint the core issues, especially when you're not inside the building and know every single detail.  And yes, I think even way back then, I hated how overvalued the QB position was and it hasn't gotten much better. It's to where my philosophy has shifted to where if you can't win a SB with a QB on their rookie contract, you might as well get another one. Otherwise, you have to give that QB so much money that the rest of the roster suffers and your window becomes quite narrow.  That's why I'm skeptical that Mahomes/Burrow/Jackson/Allen will win more than one or two SB's between them. None of them look as invisible as they did a few years ago and that's because their targets are much inferior and/or they are getting more roughed up behind a worse O-line.
    • Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 
×
×
  • Create New...