Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs


 Share

Recommended Posts

Interesting, never thought about it until just now, but these new kickoff rules could really screw teams over in a snow game like this if the kicker just isn't physically able to get a proper run up, plant, and kick to get it to the landing zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

The Bills were the 9th best rushing team this year

Lamar had 915 yards rushing this year and is anything but a power runner (what you need in the snow) who's running game is 100% predicated on his speed and ability to cut and make defenders miss.

In no way are the Bills more affected by a snow game than the Ravens are because of what it does to Lamar's threat to run.

agree to disagree man, not gonna bother continuing to go back and forth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Derrick Henry?

I said that in my other post, that yes, it does help Henry because of his power game.  

But removing Lamar's running threat hurts them on the whole more than they're helped by Henry's power running game.  Especially since it then allows the Bills to really focus on Henry and don't need to worry about Lamar quite as much because the snow would slow him down.

It basically means the Bills would no longer need to spy Lamar and it gives them an extra man in the box to focus on stopping Henry.

Like I said before, it's a net negative even though there is one positive for them with Henry in the snow.

While at the same time, the snow probably also helps the Bills running game more, because good luck tackling Allen in those conditions when he runs too.  So if it adds to the threat of Allen running but hurts Lamar's running threat, it's another net positive for the Bills.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

There will only likely be 10-15 of those guys in the league at a given time. 

There are 16 currently at $40 mil or more AAV.

Exactly. A lot of these teams are handicapping themselves tying up way too much cap space into QBs that aren't good enough to justify it. You're better off building up a better roster around a guy on a rookie deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rams just can't hold onto the ball, has absolutely killed them and is inexcusable even in the snow. I guess hold them to a FG now and they still have a chance but I can't see the Rams getting a TD at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • no doubt but flip that.   The current system insures that there are "regional" games in the early weeks. maximizing the reach of playoff football.  If all of the WC weekend for a conference took place on the west coast they are reducing the "reach" of their hype machine.
    • Hard to say with London--he never ran--combine or pro day.  Here is what AI says, and it is always 100% accurate: Drake London's 40-yard dash time at the NFL Combine was not recorded because he was dealing with a fractured ankle at the time. While he didn't participate in the 40 at the Combine or his pro day, his coach said his 40 time was estimated to be between 4.4 and 4.53 seconds. Some sources also list his 40 time at 4.58 and 4.6 seconds Unless you are running 9s all day, top end 40 speed is rarely reached.  I have always looked at the 3-cone drill.  At his pro day, TMac ran a 6.86--pretty good, actually.  For context, it is faster that Rome Odunze (6.88) who ran a 4.45 40.  Odunze is 6'3" and weighs 216, fwiw, and is considered a very good route runner with no wasted motion.  Mike Evans 3-cone was 7.08.  To put it in a broader context, through 2022, with all NFL prospect 3-cone drills combined, a 6.86 puts TMac in the.89th percentile-  Now consider the fact that he is 6'4" and 220.   We might have something here.  '  
×
×
  • Create New...