Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Don't forget though on Jakes best statistical season Smitty went down week one leaving a rookie Keary Colbert as a starting WR with Mangum at TE and Nick Goings the starting RB.

That was Delhommes best year as a QB and a distributor of the ball. I think Jake was the right QB at the right time. But he was also a flawed player. Once he couldn’t rely on his arm to force throws he got exposed in other areas of his game. Hate to say it but he was holding the team back in 2008. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OneBadCat said:

That was Delhommes best year as a QB and a distributor of the ball. I think Jake was the right QB at the right time. But he was also a flawed player. Once he couldn’t rely on his arm to force throws he got exposed in other areas of his game. Hate to say it but he was holding the team back in 2008. 

Yeah, not paying Jake as perfect by any means I just think a lot of people act like his success was all because of Smitty. The Tommy John surgery ruined him. It seemed like it effected his accuracy and confidence more than his arm strength IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Don't forget though on Jakes best statistical season Smitty went down week one leaving a rookie Keary Colbert as a starting WR with Mangum at TE and Nick Goings the starting RB.

Well Moose also had 1400/16 and we did have Ricky Proehl still then. I would say that is still a better group than what the Ravens have currently. It's a pretty underwhelming group without Flowers and Andrews kind of being a ghost of himself.

I'll take 2007 Moose and Co over these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Well Moose also had 1400/16 and we did have Ricky Proehl still then. I would say that is still a better group than what the Ravens have currently. It's a pretty underwhelming group without Flowers and Andrews kind of being a ghost of himself.

I'll take 2007 Moose and Co over these guys.

Moose absolutely had a career year but Proehl was 36 at that point and pretty limited. I'd take the Ravens skill position crew over what Jake was working with that year for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Moose absolutely had a career year but Proehl was 36 at that point and pretty limited. I'd take the Ravens skill position crew over what Jake was working with that year for sure.

I will take our WR's and TE's. The RB group isn't even an argument. The Ravens backup RB would have been a starter for us then, to say nothing of the greatest RB of this generation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, not paying Jake as perfect by any means I just think a lot of people act like his success was all because of Smitty. The Tommy John surgery ruined him. It seemed like it effected his accuracy and confidence more than his arm strength IMO.

I think he wasn’t reading the field well and Smitty spoiled him a bit with his insane talent. There was a time where Jake had a special arm but I think it masked a lot of flaws in his game. Matt Moore was the better QB in 07/08. I was pissed that Fox didn’t pull Jake at half time against ARZ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've never seen them outside of the structure of two very well ran organizations I'll give you that. And yes they are long in the tooth. I do think they are more than capable of getting a franchise turned around in short term capacity though. They are by no means a long term solution.
    • You're not making a good-faith argument by blaming literally everything on the quarterback when the defense gave him a fat 38 seconds to overcome its ineptitude, but it seems you're dead-set on blaming him for any problem the team encounters. In this case, it's not warranted. Sometimes it is. But he had no time to throw (pressured on 46% of all dropbacks, an insane amount) and that's simply not all his fault -- particularly when they rush 4 or less and are in the backfield in 1.5s or less. Should we have gotten more than 0 yards? Sure! But he hit a WR in the hands on fourth down and it was dropped. Not his fault. He missed one throw on second down but I attribute first down to a bad play call and third down to poor pass protection. I would've called some quick slants, personally, but it really seems you're saying: - playcalling: Bryce's fault - poor pass protection: Bryce's fault - defensive choking away a lead: Bryce's fault, not the defense - Horn dropping a pass: Bryce's fault It's a great way to garner support on here, because when it comes to Bryce, logic takes such a backseat to context that it's not even in the same vehicle. Plenty of games can be attributed to him. Can't take anyone seriously who solely blames him for that one. 
    • I don't see how you can logically make that argument when the team beat two of the top teams in the entire league during the regular season.  Now imagine the additional games we would have won against absolute tip top competitors like SF and SEA had we had a professional QB.  You can throw any random stat at the problem you want, but the proof is in the pudding.  We all watched it live.  This roster would have produced 13 wins (wins against SF and SEA, two wins against NO, and would have swept the Bucs) and (almost certainly) a #1 seed with a remotely competent QB.  Those were not games where we needed an all star performance to win.  Those were games where a very, very modest stat line would have netted us an easy win. Nearly every measurable aspect of the team would have been significantly improved with a competent QB.
×
×
  • Create New...