Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why is Fox out the door?


The Don

Recommended Posts

Fox will be back, but there's no reason to extend his contract until someone blinks on the CBA. The possibility of no NFL in 2011 has smart owners attempting to limit their guaranteed payouts to athletes and coaches that won't be taking the field in a year with no revenues.

Fox has given the team a credibility it has never had before, turning it into a regular contender. Winning season, losing season, winning season, we know the drill. But let's face it, his worst seasons here have produced no worse than 7-9.

Sure, we're not the Patriots or the Colts, we're more on par with the Eagles or Chargers over Fox's tenure when it comes to being competitive. Second tier is worth holding onto, especially if it can peak into the Super Bowl. And there is nothing to be gained by risking a slip back into the third and fourth tiers of the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's too stuborn in his own ways. He hasn't changed game plans even when its failing. He is terrible at managing the clock. He's been too loyal to his choices of who to start regardless if someone else has been outperforming that player. He has alot to change this season and alot to prove. This upcoming season will be the deciding factor if he stays or leaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox will be back, but there's no reason to extend his contract until someone blinks on the CBA. The possibility of no NFL in 2011 has smart owners attempting to limit their guaranteed payouts to athletes and coaches that won't be taking the field in a year with no revenues.

Fox has given the team a credibility it has never had before, turning it into a regular contender. Winning season, losing season, winning season, we know the drill. But let's face it, his worst seasons here have produced no worse than 7-9.

Sure, we're not the Patriots or the Colts, we're more on par with the Eagles or Chargers over Fox's tenure when it comes to being competitive. Second tier is worth holding onto, especially if it can peak into the Super Bowl. And there is nothing to be gained by risking a slip back into the third and fourth tiers of the league.

you can't even compare Fox to the Eagles/Reid era. Fox isn't consistant and he coaches not to lose. Philly has made the playoffs how many times the past 8 years? We aren't the Patriots and we aren't even the Eagles. Fox's style of won't make this team a consistant winner (Fox's record shows that).....it makes them consistantly not a bottom tier team. That approach had its time here and is done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I think Fox is a good coach, he has many downfalls. He is a great defensive and run oriented coach Knows how to get the most of out players and is very conservative. The problem is that the pass game is what wins in the NFL today because of recent rule changes. He weakness is his stubbornness and it has cost us many games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may wait to see how this season goes and then offer Fox an extension, but I can't see how they could be using this year to evaluate Fox with the current roster.

It's not so much about the guys we let go (besides Peppers) as it is about the guys we didn't bring in. It's clear to me that the # 1 priority this off season is to save as much $$$ as possible while still being reasonably competitive... so I'm not sure how you can evaluate a coach under those conditions?

Once again, I suspect the decision has already been made and we will allow Fox to walk after this year unless he makes a deep run into the playoffs at a minimum... and even at that, Fox may choose to go elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may wait to see how this season goes and then offer Fox an extension, but I can't see how they could be using this year to evaluate Fox with the current roster.

It's not so much about the guys we let go (besides Peppers) as it is about the guys we didn't bring in. It's clear to me that the # 1 priority this off season is to save as much $$$ as possible while still being reasonably competitive... so I'm not sure how you can evaluate a coach under those conditions?

Once again, I suspect the decision has already been made and we will allow Fox to walk after this year unless he makes a deep run into the playoffs at a minimum... and even at that, Fox may choose to go elsewhere.

I think they evaluate him based upon how he coaches, how he game plans, adjusts, makes sure the best players are on the field, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they evaluate him based upon how he coaches, how he game plans, adjusts, makes sure the best players are on the field, etc.

Could be, but if they feel he did all that well and they go 4-12 do they offer him an extension?

At some point the W/L record has to be a factor...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether Fox stays or goes I'd bet money he will be back in the playoffs and extension for Fox will be like any other contract deal, performance talks. Last time I checked he is still playing out his contract. Another failure year and he is sure to go but I don't think that will happen. Don't care because I like Fox he is stubborn but changing players and coordinators forces him to think differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not exactly sure that is an honest assesment of the talent he had to work with that year. Olsen had over 1100 yards that season making the PB, Stewart had close to 1100 total yards also going to the PB. He had Kalil at C who went to the PB, Trai Turner at RG who also went to the PB, and Michael Oher at LT who played well enough that the Panthers offered him a new contract the following year. I wouldn't call that a trash OL. He also played with a defense that was stacked with talent as well.   "The thing we are doing better this time around is actually surrounding our #1 overall draft pick QB with talent vs. asking him to completely carry the offense. I just hope that effort is leading us to realize that the guy isn't even good enough to get carried." Please.... Did you not read the list of names Newton had to work with his rookie season. I guess you missed it so I will post it again for you... Steve Smith (PB), Greg Olsen (PB), Brandon LaFell, Ted Ginn JR, Deangelo Williams (PB), Jonathan Stewart (PB), Jordan Grossn (PB), Ryan Kalil (PB) on the offensive side and then he had Luke Kuechly (PB), Jon Beason (PB), Thomas Davis (PB), Star Lotulelei, Kawann Short ( PB ),Charles Johnson, Greg Hardy (PB ), Mike Mitchell, Josh Norman (PB)  For comparison, here is who Young had his first year.  Chuba Hubbard, DJ Chark, Jonathan Mingo, Adam Thielen, Hayden Hurst, Ikem Ekwonu, Chandler Zavala, Bradley Bozeman, Nash Jensen and Taylor Morton. Not a single PB player on the list and most of them aren't even playing any longer. Additionally, his HC was fired during the season and the defense was as bad as the offense.  You might not like the comparison but saying Newton had to completely carry the offense isn't exactly fair to the 4 pro bowlers on offense who played with him that year.
    • That's why I say we have to keep looking. Even if you believe Bryce is the guy, KP and Grier are not and who knows if King is anything more than a gimmick player, we should be active in improving our 2nd QB spot. Season ending injuries happen, and you don't just want to roll over and give it up. How many starters have we seen come from the ranks of backup? Having 2 potential starting QBs is one of the best problems we could have. 
    • Eh, it’s more on how bad the refs are. Some of these calls against the canes are no calls 
×
×
  • Create New...