Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Graziano: Panthers will be fairly aggressive in free-agency


Recommended Posts

I'm very iffy on paying Jevon Holland big money. He's a good young player, but is he worth elite safety money? I can't help but think that money would be better spent elsewhere.

Milton Williams I am fully on-board with bringing in. If we can somehow land Mason Graham in the draft and pair him with Williams and Derrick Brown that would be a terrifying front-3.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CatalystNX said:

I'm very iffy on paying Jevon Holland big money. He's a good young player, but is he worth elite safety money? I can't help but think that money would be better spent elsewhere.

Milton Williams I am fully on-board with bringing in. If we can somehow land Mason Graham in the draft and pair him with Williams and Derrick Brown that would be a terrifying front-3.

Spending mega bucks in free agency for a second straight season would be a bad sign.

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Spending mega bucks in free agency for a second straight season would be a bad sign.

I’d prefer a more measured approach but hey, it worked last year. I’m looking forward to seeing what what Dan and Brandt have in mind.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they will go after a S and I predicted Milton Williams weeks ago--and I don't have a podcast or blog, just comes natural--I learned that the more you predict, the more you are right!.  Seriously, and I agree that two years of free agent dumpster diving is not good, but with multiple needs at S and DL, I think we have to go there.  Expect $20m to Williams, I have not researched the Safeties he mentioned.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year we need a g and Hunt was probably the top free agent at G.  We went after him on the first day of free agency tampering period.  I think we take the same approach to Williams--which means top dollar.  Of course, I imagine the Eagles will see if they can keep him--not sure what the story is there.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Not confident we can outbid other teams for Milton Williams.  I doubt it happens.  Hope I am wrong 

I think Washington makes a run at him. They have the cap space to get him.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I think Washington makes a run at him. They have the cap space to get him.

Would be a great get for them.  I have seen some talk about the Titans spending big on him (they have 50m in space)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...