Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you feel better?


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

Of course hindsight is 20-20 but how much better would you feel about the defense if the front office could have kept diggs and Lewis? Lewis was the one guy I never really understood why we released him bc he had been a pretty steady player over the past few seasons and with two DT's coming off injured reserve it just didn't make sense. Now the same can be said about diggs with the injury to Davis.

Or would you be just as concerned if they were here? To me losing Harris was an example of a move where I didn't really feel we lost anything except maybe leadership. I guess it just seems like the defense has taken a huge hit and we have really lost more than we gained...and you know the old Fox saying, "if you aren't getting better, your getting worse."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last sack I can remember Lewis getting was in the Arizona playoff game, I think early in the first quarter. Lewis was brought in for his pass rushing ability, but had little to none. He did however (oddly) end up being decent against the run. It's easy to replace a player who is decent against the run, with little to no pass rush. Fox did it in a jiffy. What does 'jiffy' actually mean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last sack I can remember Lewis getting was in the Arizona playoff game, I think early in the first quarter. Lewis was brought in for his pass rushing ability, but had little to none. He did however (oddly) end up being decent against the run. It's easy to replace a player who is decent against the run, with little to no pass rush. Fox did it in a jiffy. What does 'jiffy' actually mean?

guessing its a relation to jiffy cornbread since that doesnt take but like 5 mins to prepare and 15 to cook .. but then again thats just a guess :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, a little but I understand where the FO was going with the moves they made this year.

The 2011 season is looking like a lockout. There is a ton of young talented guys that we either drafted or traded for. This is a pretty good year to find out what you have and you need to know. Fox was stuck in a rut with the old guys because of the pressure on him to win. The old guys were not really getting us anywhere and with this wealth of talented young players they either needed to poo or get off the pot.

If the younguns don't perform then we have a possible year without any football to come up with a new gameplan and go in a new direction. I personally think that we are going to be fine.

The fear of the unknown is really bothering fans but if you look at this roster it is full of potential.

The only player I would have liked to of kept was Pep and they made him a hell of a deal. Supposedly on par and maybe slightly more than what Chicago gave him. He just wanted out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its not all about pass rush folks, those guys stop the run too, if you want to see what tyler and leonard can do, go watch the miami game again and think to yourself, dang we are not going to have jp either... that is what our oline is going to look like

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course hindsight is 20-20 but how much better would you feel about the defense if the front office could have kept diggs and Lewis? Lewis was the one guy I never really understood why we released him bc he had been a pretty steady player over the past few seasons and with two DT's coming off injured reserve it just didn't make sense. Now the same can be said about diggs with the injury to Davis.

Or would you be just as concerned if they were here? To me losing Harris was an example of a move where I didn't really feel we lost anything except maybe leadership. I guess it just seems like the defense has taken a huge hit and we have really lost more than we gained...and you know the old Fox saying, "if you aren't getting better, your getting worse."

Ask me this question in about 3 months or so, because it depends on how the new guys work out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The better question is whether outside of Peppers and Jake, would you feel better bringing back the other veterans to compete with all of the younger guys and seeing who wins out and who gets cut in camp. Would folks be happier if Lewis, Diggs, Moose, Hoover and Kemo were still here competing. It would mean we couldn't have brought in a few camp fodder guys who are not going to make the roster anyway.

The answer for me would be an emphatic yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...