Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FREEAGENCY FRENZY


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, L-TownCat said:

Pretty sure that’s baked into the trade.  If it’s expected the player needs a big new contract, the trade value of said player dips a bit.

It will still be costly tho.

That would be the most I would give up for him. I still would not feel good about the trade after.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Nah hell no, swap 1sts and 2nds and call it even since we are paying a massive contract. 

 

I think Panthers can get or just play hard ball. This is his 2nd str8 tag, not many teams have or want to give millions right now to some #2 WR. 

They need to pay Chase 40 million per. 

IDK, I'd still lean on youR favorite movie= tmac at 8th.....

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basbear said:

 

I think Panthers can get or just play hard ball. This is his 2nd str8 tag, not many teams have or want to give millions right now to some #2 WR. 

They need to pay Chase 40 million per. 

IDK, I'd still lean on youR favorite movie= tmac at 8th.....

If it were me and I was hell bent on not going defense at 8 I would be trying to trade the pick to the highest bidder. There are wr's that are better fits for us later in the 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

That would be the most I would give up for him. I still would not feel good about the trade after.

Not crazy about trades buuuuut… we are seemingly incapable of drafting/developing WR talent.  This seems to be our only way to get a known commodity at the position.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, L-TownCat said:

Not crazy about trades buuuuut… we are seemingly incapable of drafting/developing WR talent.  This seems to be our only way to get a known commodity at the position.  

They need to avoid the 2nd round curse. Just take one in the 3rd or later until you hit on one.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...